segura@attcanada.ca writes:
What version of SmartList are you using?
I'm not sure, but this was in the rc.submit file:
#$Id: rc.submit,v 1.83 1997/04/28 00:27:43 srb Exp $
Hmm, that looks like version 3.11pre7. If you're wondering what has changed since then, the current version's HISTORY file can be found at:
http://www.procmail.org/procmail-3.15/SmartList/HISTORY
...
Yes, I did remove those # - it reads:
#reply_to
reply_to = "Reply-To: $listaddr"
##reply_to = "Resent-Reply-To: $listaddr" # uncomment (and perhaps change
and the rc.submit file reads:
-a"Subject: Unidentified subject!" ${reply_to:+"-i$reply_to"} \
With these changes, any reply to a message which has been "tricked" into the reply-to list mode by changing the To content to the list works fine. If you don't substitute the list address, no joy - it only goes back to the sender.
I'm not sure what you mean by that. You've changed rc.submit to always insert the Reply-To: header, overriding anything supplied by the sender, but I don't see anything in SmartList that would make it skip that recipe based on whether or not the list address was in a recipient header. Do you still have the messages that made brought you to that conclusion?
Philip Guenther