Hello:
Does SmartList have an archiving and (hopefully user friendly) search capability?
[I'm not interested in the archives of this Disc List, but of the list I run for my
'users'].
Thanks,
Mitch Darer
--
Mitchell Darer, WebMaster, mitch(a)focusing.org
The Focusing Institute, 34 East Lane, Spring Valley, NY 10977
http://www.focusing.org (845) 362-5222 (phone/fax)
At 11:41 AM -0400 7/28/00, Werner Reisberger is rumored to have typed:
> I never saw any
> admin reply to the numerous complains about spam messages.
Actually, that's not _strictly_ true, since I remember when Stephen was
actually maintaining the list (and probably anally have archives of the list
from that time somewhere on some floppy or MO cart from a long time ago and
far far away). But you're right, it's been _years_ since he's been around.
However, the list belongs to the maintainer (or at least the machine's
admin), not the members. You'll get no argument from me that the list should
be moved (I believe I said exactly that a couple of times), but to suggest
the admins need to take a poll to ask what they may or may not do with the
existing list is silly, to say the least. They are certainly able to move
this list to mailman without the list subscriber's permission - indeed, they
_have_ done so, which makes my point for me.
Whether we should move this list to a SmartList server is a completely
seperate issue...one which Philip should probably weigh in on, since he is
now maintaining the procmail/SmartList source and as such the de facto head
of our band of merry wanderers...
Charlie
Greetings,
Is it possible to block the reply of certain individuals from being
distributed to a mailing list? Their accounts have been removed and it is
only possible for certain people to post to the list. However, neither one
of these options eliminates the possibility of these unwanted individuals
from responding.
Thanks in advance.
Tom O'Rourke
I want to remove html attachments from postings but the links in the FAQ
don't work and seems to be quite old.
Could someone give me a working solution for the removal of this garbage?
Werner
Greetings,
I have been perusing through the manuals and FAQs and have been testing, but
just cannot seem to get this idea to work:
1. I need a list for people to subscribe to (done and working)
2. The owner/admin/whatever of the list sends an
announcement/newsletter/alert (done and working)
3. Those who receive the email should NOT be able to Reply to the entire
list; reply the owner/admin is okay.
I have tried the foreign_submit idea, and attempted other measures, but
cannot seem to get it where REPLY-ALL will not send to the entire list.
What needs to be done to make this happen? Thank you for your input.
Jonathan
There are sources for a database that is compatible with procmail(1)
scripts and audits the IP addresses in "Received: " headers at:
http://www.johncon.com/john/receivedIP/
John
--
John Conover Tel. 408.370.2688 conover(a)rahul.net
631 Lamont Ct. Cel. 408.772.7733 http://www.johncon.com/
Campbell, CA 95008 Fax. 408.379.9602
Hi help required. From the manual it says you can autosend files to new
subscribers by creating a "subscribe.files" file?
Is there an example file I can look at? What sort of file is this???
Thanks, David
Dear all,
Does any one can help............please ???
Thanks and regards,
Kevin Chan
----- Original Message -----
From: senthil
To: Kevin Chan
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 6:50 AM
Subject: Re: How to set quota from procmail ?
Hi all
I am having the same problem here. But I am using Redhat Linus 6.2 . I tried with other mail parsers like mail drop and all but to no help. Is there any good suggestions.
Regards
Senthil
Sys Admin
YIPL
Bangalore
----- Original Message -----
From: Kevin Chan
To: procmail(a)informatik.rwth-aachen.de
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 10:23 AM
Subject: How to set quota from procmail ?
Dear all,
I was set-up the sendmail in my Linux RedHat 7.0 Server and it was working fine. As I know RedHat is using procmail for delivery agent. Also, I was set-up the quote for all user from /etc/fstab ( 6M for each user) but it seem doesn't work on procmail . Because I was send 5 e-mails in same user and each mail around 2M, it seem I can send all mail (around 10M) because no error message but I only received 3 mails back. Please tell me how I can fix this problem because I would like to set the quote for all user and if the quote was excess then the sender will get the error message. Thanks a lot. Please teach me how I can config the procmail to resolve my problem. Also, how I can improve the login time when I try to send/receive mail from Microsoft Outlook Express because I feel it take longer than I am using Microsoft Exchange Server before. Thanks a lot !
Thanks and regards,
===========================
Kevin Chan
Senior System Engineer
Trasy Gold Ex Limited
14/F, Cheung Fat Bidg, 7-9 Hill Rd,
Western District, Hong Kong.
Tel: (852) 2975-6230
Fax: (852) 2975-6354
===========================
Just a remark for better readability. Please don't reply to a list message
if you really want to write a new one.
This creates a faked thread like the following in every mail client which
uses Message-Id and In-Reply-To header fields for thread display:
29 04/09 O'Rourke, Tom ( (1.6K) blocking a reply
30 04/10 Ken Bass (1.6K) => More smartlist problems
31 04/10 CueMan (1.4K) => Moderation setup questions...
We are professionals, aren't we? ;)
Werner
--
Werner Reisberger pgp-public-key available:
Viktoriastr. 15 http://www.pure.ch/mypubkey.txt
CH-8057 Zurich
Anyone know how to get a digest to appear more friendly to users of MS
Outlook Express.
Basically, each part of the digest is a separate attachment rather than a
message that can be easily clicked.
I'm trying to figure this out so I can allow the mailing list users to send
in a "set digest to 'im using lame ms software'" and send those people MS
outlook compatible digests.
Any ideas? Some MIME type other than multipart/digest?