All,
I am trying to use rc.local.s10.mhonarc from
http://www.ha-schneider.de/software/smartlist/
to set up an archive for a mailing list.
I have renamed rc.local.s10.mhonarc to rc.local.s30 and added following line to rc.custom
RC_LOCAL_SUBMIT_30 = rc.local.s30
rc.local.s10 and rc.local.s20 are already in use and since I do not know how to merge the recipe in rc.local.s10.mhonarc with either of the two, I renamed it to rc.local.s30 and added a new line in rc.custom.
Could someone please help me understand as to how it all works.
Thanks
Nishi
The following is a sample of the results of a search that I receive by email.
This there a way to hide the line number?
ARCHIVE egrep august latest/*
BEGIN---------------cut here------------------
latest/10:16:Monday, August 27, 2001
latest/11:16:Tuesday, August 21, 2001
latest/12:16:Wednesday, August 29, 2001
END-----------------cut here------------------
Thanks for your help!
Alan,
hi!
how can i modyfiy the text for the automatic subscribe/unsubscribe-mail?
The possibilities of a *subscribe.txt*-file in my folder are not enough for
me. I want suppress the information about the transmited data and translate
the rest of the mail to german.
TIA, martin
--
"Who needs horror movies when we have Microsoft?"
- Christine Comaford, PC Week
Hello:
Does SmartList have an archiving and (hopefully user friendly) search capability?
[I'm not interested in the archives of this Disc List, but of the list I run for my
'users'].
Thanks,
Mitch Darer
--
Mitchell Darer, WebMaster, mitch(a)focusing.org
The Focusing Institute, 34 East Lane, Spring Valley, NY 10977
http://www.focusing.org (845) 362-5222 (phone/fax)
At 11:41 AM -0400 7/28/00, Werner Reisberger is rumored to have typed:
> I never saw any
> admin reply to the numerous complains about spam messages.
Actually, that's not _strictly_ true, since I remember when Stephen was
actually maintaining the list (and probably anally have archives of the list
from that time somewhere on some floppy or MO cart from a long time ago and
far far away). But you're right, it's been _years_ since he's been around.
However, the list belongs to the maintainer (or at least the machine's
admin), not the members. You'll get no argument from me that the list should
be moved (I believe I said exactly that a couple of times), but to suggest
the admins need to take a poll to ask what they may or may not do with the
existing list is silly, to say the least. They are certainly able to move
this list to mailman without the list subscriber's permission - indeed, they
_have_ done so, which makes my point for me.
Whether we should move this list to a SmartList server is a completely
seperate issue...one which Philip should probably weigh in on, since he is
now maintaining the procmail/SmartList source and as such the de facto head
of our band of merry wanderers...
Charlie
Following some advice/examples I had this recipe in
my rc.local.s10:
:0 BH
* ^Subject:
| formail -i "Subject: [Empty Subject Line]" \
| (/usr/bin/cat; /usr/bin/cat $INFO/reject.nosubj $tmprequest) \
| $SENDMAIL -t
However this cause infinite loops in processing a posted mail.
The log file shows many such lines:
........................
__________
>From foo@bar Wed Feb 26 12:10:58 2003
Folder: formail -R"From X-From_:" -iDate: -iReturn-Receipt-To:
-iRea 2463329
__________
>From foo@bar Wed Feb 26 12:11:08 2003
Folder: formail -R"From X-From_:" -iDate: -iReturn-Receipt-To:
-iRea 2492132
__________
.........................
__________
Subject: [Empty Subject Line]
Folder: formail -i "Subject: [Empty Subject Line]" \ |
(/usr/bin/c 5701200
To: list@mydomain
From: scott(a)iastate.edu
__________
Subject: [Empty Subject Line]
Folder: formail -i "Subject: [Empty Subject Line]" \ |
(/usr/bin/c 11403052
To: list@mydomain
From: scott(a)iastate.edu
__________
When I took out this recipe, loop disappears and list function
return to normal. Any idea something is wrong?
Thanks in advance!
Zhiliang
Hi,
I'm sending X-command like subscribe and unsubscribe to my list. I what to
disable that a copy of subscribe/unsubscribe will be sent to the listmember.
How do I do that?
Kind Regards,
// Henric
At times, subscribers in my mailing list have their quota full (or their mail server is down, etc. etc.) and as a result, postings to their addresses bounce. All these bounced emails are then coming back to me since I am the moderator of the list. I am managing three moderated lists, each having 1000+ subscribers and so, these bounced emails are turning out to be quite overwhelming.
Is there a way to redirect these bounced emails to /dev/null instead of moderator ?
Thanks
Nishi
Hi All!
I have followed the steps described in the FAQ about the size limiting
of the list and about sending auto notification for the sender.
In the FAQ the place of this rule is said to be rc.local.00. The list
archive contains the same. I assume it should be rc.local.r00, because
if set in rc.local.s00 nothing happens.
My problem with this is the following:
If I send a mail bigger than the maximum size, then the owner-listaddr
gets a message about the size not the sender. I've set the
reply_to="Reply-To: owner-$listaddr" in rc.custom to avoid auto replays.
In the tmp.from file I can see a foo@bar line after processing.
It seems to me that the mail gets processed, the reply_to address is
set, and the size check follows only then. The original sender gets no
error messages . I might be wrong about this, but there are no other
lines in config files or "binaries" which uses owner-listaddr.
Any ideas how should I solve this problem?
Thanks for your help:
Odri Kornel
--
Odri Kornél (Netstudio Hungary Kft.-- http://www.netstudio.hu )
Key fingerprint: 8B80 FEFA 3817 2432 A862 3620 C15F AA96 F681 97B2
mailto:korci@netstudio.hu
On [2003-Feb-19] Gyan Penrose-Kafka <gyan(a)zenmonkey.net> wrote:
> How about considering problems from alternate perspectives
Sounds like good advice...
>
> The issue on my end is as a way to quickly isolate spam from legitimate and useful messages
Why not apply your advice to this very problem?
Experience has shown that the best approach is to first remove all the email *known* to be good ( i.e. not spam) from the stream and then apply your spam filters (or spamassassin or spamkiller or spamboinker or...) to the remainder. Less work for you, less work for your filters.
I chose smartlist as my listmanager (quite some time ago now) because it allowed be to configure my lists the way I want them to be and anyone else who has the software has that same opportunity. I did spend some time learning the background to some of the choices though so I could make informed decisions about those setup options. Since I work on a unix platform I have a much wider choice of tools to manage my email than others might have so I am free to rewrite the subject lines on my incoming email (should I choose to) and add all sorts of things. Perhaps if your email is proving to be a management problem you might want to consider moving to a platform that gives you more options to help you get it under control.
Rich
--
richard_ball(a)merck.com
(I regret the presence of the legal disclaimer but I have no control over it)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice: This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains information of Merck & Co., Inc. (Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA) that may be confidential, proprietary copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by e-mail and then delete it.
==============================================================================