All,
I am trying to use rc.local.s10.mhonarc from
http://www.ha-schneider.de/software/smartlist/
to set up an archive for a mailing list.
I have renamed rc.local.s10.mhonarc to rc.local.s30 and added following line to rc.custom
RC_LOCAL_SUBMIT_30 = rc.local.s30
rc.local.s10 and rc.local.s20 are already in use and since I do not know how to merge the recipe in rc.local.s10.mhonarc with either of the two, I renamed it to rc.local.s30 and added a new line in rc.custom.
Could someone please help me understand as to how it all works.
Thanks
Nishi
The following is a sample of the results of a search that I receive by email.
This there a way to hide the line number?
ARCHIVE egrep august latest/*
BEGIN---------------cut here------------------
latest/10:16:Monday, August 27, 2001
latest/11:16:Tuesday, August 21, 2001
latest/12:16:Wednesday, August 29, 2001
END-----------------cut here------------------
Thanks for your help!
Alan,
hi!
how can i modyfiy the text for the automatic subscribe/unsubscribe-mail?
The possibilities of a *subscribe.txt*-file in my folder are not enough for
me. I want suppress the information about the transmited data and translate
the rest of the mail to german.
TIA, martin
--
"Who needs horror movies when we have Microsoft?"
- Christine Comaford, PC Week
Hello:
Does SmartList have an archiving and (hopefully user friendly) search capability?
[I'm not interested in the archives of this Disc List, but of the list I run for my
'users'].
Thanks,
Mitch Darer
--
Mitchell Darer, WebMaster, mitch(a)focusing.org
The Focusing Institute, 34 East Lane, Spring Valley, NY 10977
http://www.focusing.org (845) 362-5222 (phone/fax)
At 11:41 AM -0400 7/28/00, Werner Reisberger is rumored to have typed:
> I never saw any
> admin reply to the numerous complains about spam messages.
Actually, that's not _strictly_ true, since I remember when Stephen was
actually maintaining the list (and probably anally have archives of the list
from that time somewhere on some floppy or MO cart from a long time ago and
far far away). But you're right, it's been _years_ since he's been around.
However, the list belongs to the maintainer (or at least the machine's
admin), not the members. You'll get no argument from me that the list should
be moved (I believe I said exactly that a couple of times), but to suggest
the admins need to take a poll to ask what they may or may not do with the
existing list is silly, to say the least. They are certainly able to move
this list to mailman without the list subscriber's permission - indeed, they
_have_ done so, which makes my point for me.
Whether we should move this list to a SmartList server is a completely
seperate issue...one which Philip should probably weigh in on, since he is
now maintaining the procmail/SmartList source and as such the de facto head
of our band of merry wanderers...
Charlie
First, thanks to those who developed Smart List. It was
exactly what we needed.
Couple of questions:
1. Currently, list subscribers do not receive a copy of
their own posting when they post something to the list.
I've checked the FAQ and the manual, and I don't see a
way to allow list subscribers to receive a copy of their
own postings.
For the time being, I've used the recipe from the FAQ
to set up an auto-reply, so the Sender at least knows
that their message was received and posted successfully.
But, for the long-term, I'd like to set it up so that
subscribers will receive a copy of their own list postings.
Is there a recipe that I can add to rc.local.s20 in order
to accomplish that?
2. If I am manually maintaining the dist/accept file for a
particular list, and I want to temporarily comment out
a subscriber so that they will not receive list postings,
would this be the correct syntax:
(username(a)my.domain.net (User's Name))
I'm concerned about the nested comments for (User's Name).
Will that throw off Smart List, or can Smart List handle
nested parens?
Thanks in advance
Stanley E. Laufer
Network Administrator
School of Library and Information Science
San Jose State University
Hi
I have had the same problem. However in my case I want to be able to "spoof"
the list. I send HTML newsletters to the list from FrontPage -> Outlook ->
Hotmail -> mailist@my_domain. In other words I send from a hotmail address
with a return/reply to set to the only allowed address!
This information mismatch may also be in the X-Sender information by the
way! Have a look at the spammers header and they may have the X-Sender set
to the
real domain. It is probably a quick and dirty to redirect at that point
although I think many people use this method to send mail to a list!!
In my case it is a newsletter so after it happened the first time it was
easier to shut the list down after posting the newsletter than to hack the
rcfiles for check/filter for a match between hotmail/reply to address.
By the way I have modified my procfiles to remove all the X-Sender
information
which got me into a lot of strife with Hotmail recently. Because the
X-Sender was still in the header and out of 35,000 emails I had a few "not
happy Jon's" hotmail killed off my Premium account for a while!
Email me if you want the modified file which allows you to post to the list
from a non subscribed address but remove where the post came from. Sort of
allows people to do exactly what you are complaining about but it is useful
sometimes :-)
jon
Prof Jon Jenkins MLC
Parliament House
Macquarie Street Sydney NSW 2000
Sydney Office Ph/Fax 02-9230-2752/2205
Nth Coast Office Ph/Fax 02-6676-2947/1543
Mob 0429178817
jon(a)trac.org.au
www.trac.org.au
> -----Original Message-----
> From: smartlist-bounces(a)lists.RWTH-Aachen.DE
> [mailto:smartlist-bounces@lists.RWTH-Aachen.DE] On Behalf Of
> Charlie Summers
> Sent: Saturday, 3 June 2006 1:10 AM
> To: Harshal; SmartList
> Subject: Re:Spam with subscriber's 'from' address
>
> At 10:25 AM -0400 6/2/06, Harshal is rumored to have typed:
>
> > Any suggestions on how to handle this problem?
>
> Filter out that user's address (explaining to him the
> problem, of course)
> into your private mailbox*; if it continues with different subscribed
> addresses, it's likely a manual spam by an existing
> subscriber. Your only
> option there is to 1) moderate the list, and 2) report every
> spam to the
> upstreams until it becomes too much of a hassle for the
> spammer to continue.
>
> Charlie
>
>
>
> * There are a bazillion ways of writing procmail recipies to
> allow the "real"
> user to post while the clone cannot, but it assumes a
> familiarity with email
> header fields and procmail. In my case, for example, you
> could check for my
> address _and_ my mail server in the header fields; if mail
> with my address
> isn't delivered by 69.93.98.146, redirect away from the list
> to your private
> mailbox.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Smartlist mailing list
> Smartlist(a)lists.RWTH-Aachen.DE
> http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/smartlist
>
>
My mailing list is set up to allow posting by members only but in the
past few days spam with forged a 'from' address that matches a
subscriber's address has been getting through.
Any suggestions on how to handle this problem?
Thanks,
- Harshal
http://www.mumbai-central.com : Where Mumbaikars meet
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com