All,
I am trying to use rc.local.s10.mhonarc from
http://www.ha-schneider.de/software/smartlist/
to set up an archive for a mailing list.
I have renamed rc.local.s10.mhonarc to rc.local.s30 and added following line to rc.custom
RC_LOCAL_SUBMIT_30 = rc.local.s30
rc.local.s10 and rc.local.s20 are already in use and since I do not know how to merge the recipe in rc.local.s10.mhonarc with either of the two, I renamed it to rc.local.s30 and added a new line in rc.custom.
Could someone please help me understand as to how it all works.
Thanks
Nishi
The following is a sample of the results of a search that I receive by email.
This there a way to hide the line number?
ARCHIVE egrep august latest/*
BEGIN---------------cut here------------------
latest/10:16:Monday, August 27, 2001
latest/11:16:Tuesday, August 21, 2001
latest/12:16:Wednesday, August 29, 2001
END-----------------cut here------------------
Thanks for your help!
Alan,
hi!
how can i modyfiy the text for the automatic subscribe/unsubscribe-mail?
The possibilities of a *subscribe.txt*-file in my folder are not enough for
me. I want suppress the information about the transmited data and translate
the rest of the mail to german.
TIA, martin
--
"Who needs horror movies when we have Microsoft?"
- Christine Comaford, PC Week
Hello:
Does SmartList have an archiving and (hopefully user friendly) search capability?
[I'm not interested in the archives of this Disc List, but of the list I run for my
'users'].
Thanks,
Mitch Darer
--
Mitchell Darer, WebMaster, mitch(a)focusing.org
The Focusing Institute, 34 East Lane, Spring Valley, NY 10977
http://www.focusing.org (845) 362-5222 (phone/fax)
At 11:41 AM -0400 7/28/00, Werner Reisberger is rumored to have typed:
> I never saw any
> admin reply to the numerous complains about spam messages.
Actually, that's not _strictly_ true, since I remember when Stephen was
actually maintaining the list (and probably anally have archives of the list
from that time somewhere on some floppy or MO cart from a long time ago and
far far away). But you're right, it's been _years_ since he's been around.
However, the list belongs to the maintainer (or at least the machine's
admin), not the members. You'll get no argument from me that the list should
be moved (I believe I said exactly that a couple of times), but to suggest
the admins need to take a poll to ask what they may or may not do with the
existing list is silly, to say the least. They are certainly able to move
this list to mailman without the list subscriber's permission - indeed, they
_have_ done so, which makes my point for me.
Whether we should move this list to a SmartList server is a completely
seperate issue...one which Philip should probably weigh in on, since he is
now maintaining the procmail/SmartList source and as such the de facto head
of our band of merry wanderers...
Charlie
I plucked this recipe from the FAQ's for rc.local.s20. It
isn't working at all - no footers are getting inserted.
Any clues what may be wrong?
Can you also explain how much of the footer.txt files this
'pulls in' to compare against the message?
Jo
#
# Add text below each message - this one prevents duplication
#
TEXT=`sed -n '2 p' <footer.txt`
:0 fbBw
* $ ! $\TEXT
| cat - footer.txt
Folks;
Has anyone written any add-ons for SmartList to limit the number of
archive server requests any given address may submit within a given
timeframe? Before I look at playing around with it, I figured I'd better ask
to avoid re-inventing the wheel...
Charlie
On 2003.01.06 15:38 Jim Osborn wrote:
> I'm totally confused by the statement "I have indeed replaced A with
> B".
No wonder, since I stupidly reversed the symbols. Twice. Sorry.
The story with real names this time: subscribers David and Leo dislike
each other. Leo has blocked mail from David. David posted to the
list, so David's list traffic bounced from Leo's address. SmartList
removed David, the innocent party.
(I double-checked, and that time I told the tale right-side-out.)
Anyway, David is reinstated and Leo is banned for the present.
Hopefully Charlie Summers' testing will lead to something more
palatable to Leo.
--
Don Doumakes
I'm using the latest version of SmartList. Recently I had an episode
in which subscriber A started selectively bouncing all mail from
subscriber B. SmartList automatically unsubscribed subscriber B,
rather than the address creating the bounced mail (A).
Leaving aside the question of why A and B can't just get along, is
there a solution to the erroneous behavior? Is this a bug of which the
developers are aware?
--
Don Doumakes
On 2003.01.06 11:23 Charlie Summers wrote:
> It's unlikely he's "bouncing" mail through his SMTP server; I
> could, for
> example, add your address to sendmail's access file as a REJECT, but
> your
> list messages would still get through, since when the list distributes
> a
> message _it_ is the envelope sender, not you. Looks more like A is
> doing
> something with procmail, or worse some moronic Windoze application
> that
> trusts the From: header field.
That makes sense. Clearly, though, A is somehow returning an error
return to the MTA. Mr. A is an AOL subscriber. The bounce message
from the AOL mailer daemon to the list-request address (addresses
munged) says:
> From MAILER-DAEMON(a)mymachine.mydomain.net Fri Jan 3 07:58:09 2003
Return-Path: <MAILER-DAEMON(a)mymachine.mydomain.net>
Received: from omr-d03.mx.aol.com (omr-d03.mx.aol.com [205.188.159.1])
by mymachine.mydomain.net (8.11.6/8.11.2) with ESMTP id
h03Dw4602881
for <mylist-request(a)mydomain.net>; Fri, 3 Jan 2003 07:58:04
-0600
Received: from air-xi03.mail.aol.com (air-xi03.mail.aol.com
[172.20.116.3]) by omr-d03.mx.aol.com (v86_r1.15) with ESMTP id
RELAYIN10-0103085745; Fri, 03 Jan 2003 08:57:45 -0500
from: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON(a)aol.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 08:55:58 EST
To: <mylist-request(a)mydomain.net>
Subject: Mail Delivery Problem
Mailer: AIRmail [v90.10]
Message-ID: <200301030857.10IdEFUa06586(a)omr-d03.mx.aol.com>
Your mail to the following recipients could not be delivered
because they are not accepting mail from A(a)aol.com:
B
I don't have an informed opinion on whether this is a malformed
bounce. (Do you?) In any case, B was eventually told:
Your mail address B has been removed
from the mylist(a)mydomain.net mailinglist.
It generated an excessive amount of bounced mails.
> Your specific problem doesn't seem to call for a technical
> solution, but
> rather a social one. My solution would be, as listmaster, to reinstate
> B and
> immediately unsubscribe A until A bought a clue on how to tell the
> difference
> between Return-Path: and From:.
The suggestion at a social solution is well taken, and I have indeed
replaced A with B.
Still, I'm guessing that as an AOL subscriber, A lacks the kind of
tools that would make it possible to bounce more politely. Sooner or
later this problem will be back, with a different cast of characters,
and it would be nice to solve it technically.
--
Don Doumakes