All,
I am trying to use rc.local.s10.mhonarc from
http://www.ha-schneider.de/software/smartlist/
to set up an archive for a mailing list.
I have renamed rc.local.s10.mhonarc to rc.local.s30 and added following line to rc.custom
RC_LOCAL_SUBMIT_30 = rc.local.s30
rc.local.s10 and rc.local.s20 are already in use and since I do not know how to merge the recipe in rc.local.s10.mhonarc with either of the two, I renamed it to rc.local.s30 and added a new line in rc.custom.
Could someone please help me understand as to how it all works.
Thanks
Nishi
The following is a sample of the results of a search that I receive by email.
This there a way to hide the line number?
ARCHIVE egrep august latest/*
BEGIN---------------cut here------------------
latest/10:16:Monday, August 27, 2001
latest/11:16:Tuesday, August 21, 2001
latest/12:16:Wednesday, August 29, 2001
END-----------------cut here------------------
Thanks for your help!
Alan,
hi!
how can i modyfiy the text for the automatic subscribe/unsubscribe-mail?
The possibilities of a *subscribe.txt*-file in my folder are not enough for
me. I want suppress the information about the transmited data and translate
the rest of the mail to german.
TIA, martin
--
"Who needs horror movies when we have Microsoft?"
- Christine Comaford, PC Week
Hello:
Does SmartList have an archiving and (hopefully user friendly) search capability?
[I'm not interested in the archives of this Disc List, but of the list I run for my
'users'].
Thanks,
Mitch Darer
--
Mitchell Darer, WebMaster, mitch(a)focusing.org
The Focusing Institute, 34 East Lane, Spring Valley, NY 10977
http://www.focusing.org (845) 362-5222 (phone/fax)
At 11:41 AM -0400 7/28/00, Werner Reisberger is rumored to have typed:
> I never saw any
> admin reply to the numerous complains about spam messages.
Actually, that's not _strictly_ true, since I remember when Stephen was
actually maintaining the list (and probably anally have archives of the list
from that time somewhere on some floppy or MO cart from a long time ago and
far far away). But you're right, it's been _years_ since he's been around.
However, the list belongs to the maintainer (or at least the machine's
admin), not the members. You'll get no argument from me that the list should
be moved (I believe I said exactly that a couple of times), but to suggest
the admins need to take a poll to ask what they may or may not do with the
existing list is silly, to say the least. They are certainly able to move
this list to mailman without the list subscriber's permission - indeed, they
_have_ done so, which makes my point for me.
Whether we should move this list to a SmartList server is a completely
seperate issue...one which Philip should probably weigh in on, since he is
now maintaining the procmail/SmartList source and as such the de facto head
of our band of merry wanderers...
Charlie
Folks;
Ok, I'll admit it. I can shell script, but arch_retrieve has me crossing
my eyes and praying for salvation. While I struggle to chart and understand
the complete flow of the script, I'm curious to know if anyone here has made
modifications to it (not extensions through the retrieve.local mech) they are
willing to share as learning tools. A few things that come to mind (in no
particular order) are:
1) Ignoring maxfiles; having a guy set maxfiles to 0 and then requesting a
few hundred files is probably not a good thing.
2) Disabling body commands, and limiting to a single subject command. (Ok,
this is a little silly, but might be useful for underpowered servers.)
3) Limiting ls/get on a per-directory basis. The latest/ directory in an
interactive list contains the archives...but for a digested list it contains
the parts for the _next_ issue, and I'm not sure it's a great idea to allow
subscribers to arbitrarily pull latest/digest.body. (A great reuse of an
existing directory that, in retrospect, was probably _not_ the way to go -
I'd argue the digest build should be outside the archive tree. But that's an
issue for the digest shell script instead, so nevermind.)
4) Dropping searches. Again, a little silly, but I could imagine some
situations where I'd want to restrict or remove searches.
I'm certain there are other possible modifications I haven't thought about
that someone might have found useful; I'd think almost anything would be
helpful in learning how to alter the behavior of arch_retrieve.
Charlie
greetings -
as the subject says, i am working on installing smartlist on OS X
10.1.5. the problem i am running up against is that i already have a
working procmail (v3.21), so i tried to just install smartlist. i
found that it will not build.
i found in a previous post that it is possible to install a second
version of procmail without disturbing the default install. is this
what i should do? if so, is the procedure for installing procmail in
a non-default directory clearly outlined in the install docs? or,
since i really have not modified my procmail install, should i just
go ahead and install the new one?
thanks for any advice,
-geoff s.
--
Geoff Smith voice: 202.404.6324
Naval Research Laboratory; Code 7253 fax: 202.767.3303
4555 Overlook Ave., SW geoffrey.smith(a)nrl.navy.mil
Washington, DC 20375
<web page coming soon>
greetings -
as the subject says, i am working on installing smartlist on OS X
10.1.5. the problem i am running up against is that i already have a
working procmail (v3.21), so i tried to just install smartlist. i
found that it will not build.
i found in a previous post that it is possible to install a second
version of procmail without disturbing the default install. is this
what i should do? if so, is the procedure for installing procmail in
a non-default directory clearly outlined in the install docs? or,
since i really have not modified my procmail install, should i just
go ahead and install the new one?
thanks for any advice,
-geoff s.
--
Geoff Smith voice: 202.404.6324
Naval Research Laboratory; Code 7253 fax: 202.767.3303
4555 Overlook Ave., SW geoffrey.smith(a)nrl.navy.mil
Washington, DC 20375
<web page coming soon>
is there a way to keep the real name w/ the e-mail address upon
subscription? has anybody patched or knows of some patches that will allow
this?
tia,
Bill