The following is a sample of the results of a search that I receive by email.
This there a way to hide the line number?
ARCHIVE egrep august latest/*
BEGIN---------------cut here------------------
latest/10:16:Monday, August 27, 2001
latest/11:16:Tuesday, August 21, 2001
latest/12:16:Wednesday, August 29, 2001
END-----------------cut here------------------
Thanks for your help!
Alan,
hi!
how can i modyfiy the text for the automatic subscribe/unsubscribe-mail?
The possibilities of a *subscribe.txt*-file in my folder are not enough for
me. I want suppress the information about the transmited data and translate
the rest of the mail to german.
TIA, martin
--
"Who needs horror movies when we have Microsoft?"
- Christine Comaford, PC Week
Hello:
Does SmartList have an archiving and (hopefully user friendly) search capability?
[I'm not interested in the archives of this Disc List, but of the list I run for my
'users'].
Thanks,
Mitch Darer
--
Mitchell Darer, WebMaster, mitch(a)focusing.org
The Focusing Institute, 34 East Lane, Spring Valley, NY 10977
http://www.focusing.org (845) 362-5222 (phone/fax)
At 11:41 AM -0400 7/28/00, Werner Reisberger is rumored to have typed:
> I never saw any
> admin reply to the numerous complains about spam messages.
Actually, that's not _strictly_ true, since I remember when Stephen was
actually maintaining the list (and probably anally have archives of the list
from that time somewhere on some floppy or MO cart from a long time ago and
far far away). But you're right, it's been _years_ since he's been around.
However, the list belongs to the maintainer (or at least the machine's
admin), not the members. You'll get no argument from me that the list should
be moved (I believe I said exactly that a couple of times), but to suggest
the admins need to take a poll to ask what they may or may not do with the
existing list is silly, to say the least. They are certainly able to move
this list to mailman without the list subscriber's permission - indeed, they
_have_ done so, which makes my point for me.
Whether we should move this list to a SmartList server is a completely
seperate issue...one which Philip should probably weigh in on, since he is
now maintaining the procmail/SmartList source and as such the de facto head
of our band of merry wanderers...
Charlie
I had a strange occurrence this morning with one of my mailing
lists. User2 unsubscribed, and the list removed User1, who is another list
member from the same domain. The log file entry is below (names/domains
changed to protect the innocent):
X997 user1(a)domain.com 24689 user2(a)domain.com
Removed: user1(a)domain.com
You have been removed from the list..X
unsubscribe: 997 user1(a)domain.com 24689 user2(a)domain.com by:
user2(a)domain.com Fri Feb 15 09:31:56 EST 2002
Why would this happen?
Thanks in advance,
Irwin
Hi,
I am using smartlist with a moderator and it is
working fine but I've got a problem when I
approve a message containing attachment. It seems
that it does not recognize my approvement and send it
back to me instead of diffusing it.
Have you got an idea about this problem ??
Thanks.
Does anyone know if it is possible to get smartlist to
include in the body of the message (or as an additional header) the actual
address from the dist file that each message is sent to?
Frequently messages to my list bounce back to me from forwarded accounts
which have expired, and I can't track down the bad address in my dist
file. If I could see the original address as part of the bounced message
it would make life much easier.
+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| Barry Trent Madness takes its toll -- have exact |
| Triticom change ready! |
| Box 46427 |
| Eden Prairie, MN 55344 (The usual disclaimers apply) |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+
Hi,
Has anybody had an idea about why smartlist does not work
when I attach a file to a message using a moderator.
It works fine without attachment. I saw that the header of the message
is different if there is or not an attachment, but I thought smartlist
was
smart enough to face the eventuality ?!
Well, if somebody know something, please, help me !!!
Thanks.
Hi,
I'm trying out to figure what is the syntax for unsubscription. I looks
if I use the code from
http://www.hartzler.net/smartlist/SmartList-FAQ.html#Section_3.2
that users have to say:
Subject: X-Command: unsubscribe , right?
It also applies to the message body, right?
Can someone explain me the sentence "Now X-Commands can go at the top of
the message body. Add a blank line between the X-Commands and any other
message content (as for instance with moderator approval)." from the above
URL? Can you post an example of such moderator approval?
I'm sorry for such stupid question, although I have been using majordomo
for years and procmail for 2 years, smartlist is not that intuitive and
the docs are not clear to me. :(
TIA
--
Martin Mokrejs - PGP5.0i key is at http://www.natur.cuni.cz/~mmokrejs
MIPS / Institute for Bioinformatics <http://mips.gsf.de>
GSF - National Research Center for Environment and Health
Ingolstaedter Landstrasse 1, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany
tel.: +49-89-3187 3616 , fax: +49-89-3187 3585
Hi,
I have recently configured smartlist and it look users cannot
unsubscribe or subscribe from the list:
This is what I see in the log:
procmail: Match on ! "^Subject:(.*[^a-z])?(Re:|erro|problem|((can)?not|.*n't)\>)"
procmail: Executing " formail -rtzc -xTo: >tmp.from"
procmail: Assigning "LASTFOLDER= formail -rtzc -xTo: >tmp.from"
procmail: Assigning "LASTFOLDER= cat >tmp.request"
procmail: Executing " cat >tmp.request"
procmail: Executing "arch_retrieve,standalone"
arch_retrieve: processing for rh(a)iol.cz Fri Feb 22 22:25:04 CET 2002
arch_retrieve: requested unknown command unsubscribe.
arch_retrieve: done Fri Feb 22 22:25:04 CET 2002
procmail: Assigning "LASTFOLDER=arch_retrieve standalone"
>From rh(a)iol.cz Fri Feb 22 22:25:04 2002
Subject: unsubscribe
Folder: arch_retrieve standalone 882
procmail: Unlocking "tmp.lock"
procmail: [271896] Sun Feb 24 22:07:15 2002
procmail: Assigning "archive_hist=all"
procmail: Assigning "archive_dir=latest"
procmail: Assigning "maxhist=64"
procmail: Assigning "minbounce=4"
procmail: Assigning "unsub_assist=8"
procmail: Assigning "foreign_submit"
procmail: Assigning "force_subscribe"
procmail: Assigning "auto_unsubscribe=yes"
procmail: Assigning "auto_subscribe"
procmail: Assigning "auto_help=yes"
procmail: Assigning "divertcheck=yes"
procmail: Assigning "X_COMMAND=X-Command"
procmail: Assigning "X_COMMAND_PASSWORD=montana111.admin"
procmail: Assigning "RC_LOCAL_SUBMIT_10=rc.local.s10"
procmail: Assigning "RC_LOCAL_SUBMIT_20=rc.local.s20"
procmail: Assigning "RC_LOCAL_REQUEST_00=rc.local.r00"
I think I have somehow screwed up the configuration. ;( I did not use the -a option
whiel creating the list, according to my history. ;) Anyway, it look the archive server
running and trying to process administrative requests.
Could anyone help me. Thanks!
--
Martin Mokrejs - PGP5.0i key is at http://www.natur.cuni.cz/~mmokrejs
MIPS / Institute for Bioinformatics <http://mips.gsf.de>
GSF - National Research Center for Environment and Health
Ingolstaedter Landstrasse 1, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany
tel.: +49-89-3187 3616 , fax: +49-89-3187 3585