All,
I am trying to use rc.local.s10.mhonarc from
http://www.ha-schneider.de/software/smartlist/
to set up an archive for a mailing list.
I have renamed rc.local.s10.mhonarc to rc.local.s30 and added following line to rc.custom
RC_LOCAL_SUBMIT_30 = rc.local.s30
rc.local.s10 and rc.local.s20 are already in use and since I do not know how to merge the recipe in rc.local.s10.mhonarc with either of the two, I renamed it to rc.local.s30 and added a new line in rc.custom.
Could someone please help me understand as to how it all works.
Thanks
Nishi
The following is a sample of the results of a search that I receive by email.
This there a way to hide the line number?
ARCHIVE egrep august latest/*
BEGIN---------------cut here------------------
latest/10:16:Monday, August 27, 2001
latest/11:16:Tuesday, August 21, 2001
latest/12:16:Wednesday, August 29, 2001
END-----------------cut here------------------
Thanks for your help!
Alan,
hi!
how can i modyfiy the text for the automatic subscribe/unsubscribe-mail?
The possibilities of a *subscribe.txt*-file in my folder are not enough for
me. I want suppress the information about the transmited data and translate
the rest of the mail to german.
TIA, martin
--
"Who needs horror movies when we have Microsoft?"
- Christine Comaford, PC Week
Hello:
Does SmartList have an archiving and (hopefully user friendly) search capability?
[I'm not interested in the archives of this Disc List, but of the list I run for my
'users'].
Thanks,
Mitch Darer
--
Mitchell Darer, WebMaster, mitch(a)focusing.org
The Focusing Institute, 34 East Lane, Spring Valley, NY 10977
http://www.focusing.org (845) 362-5222 (phone/fax)
At 11:41 AM -0400 7/28/00, Werner Reisberger is rumored to have typed:
> I never saw any
> admin reply to the numerous complains about spam messages.
Actually, that's not _strictly_ true, since I remember when Stephen was
actually maintaining the list (and probably anally have archives of the list
from that time somewhere on some floppy or MO cart from a long time ago and
far far away). But you're right, it's been _years_ since he's been around.
However, the list belongs to the maintainer (or at least the machine's
admin), not the members. You'll get no argument from me that the list should
be moved (I believe I said exactly that a couple of times), but to suggest
the admins need to take a poll to ask what they may or may not do with the
existing list is silly, to say the least. They are certainly able to move
this list to mailman without the list subscriber's permission - indeed, they
_have_ done so, which makes my point for me.
Whether we should move this list to a SmartList server is a completely
seperate issue...one which Philip should probably weigh in on, since he is
now maintaining the procmail/SmartList source and as such the de facto head
of our band of merry wanderers...
Charlie
David W. Tamkin remarked:
> ,,,
> ...Subscribers may post from other addresses without telling
> you. It may be a better idea to shunt mail from unrecognized addresses
> to a holding folder that you review with your own eyes.
That seems to be a reasonable approach.
My intention was to reduce the extra traffic of bounce messages to illegal
addresses and their subsequent non-delivery notices, not so much to avoid having to
see the offending messages myself as list maintainer.
I'll watch the results for a while. Perhaps I'll get another bright idea.
--
Rick DeMattia <rad(a)nshore.org>
The secret of the universe is|^&*||x|NO CARRIER
David, thank you very kindly - the recipe now seems to work as I expected it to do.
Do you have any comment on the overall premise? Am I doing the right thing to just
drop non-subscriber mail on the floor? (After I watch that reject.nosub file for a
while, I plan to change it to /dev/null if it looks like nothing useful is getting
filed there...)
--
Rick DeMattia <rad(a)nshore.org>
The secret of the universe is|^&*||x|NO CARRIER
It occurs to me that placing this recipe at the top of rc.local.s00 might cause me
to lose legitimate mail-non-delivery notices for real subscribers.
Maybe I should put the address-matching in the "rejectmesg" and "quotereject"
scripts, rather than in the rc.local.s00?
--
Rick DeMattia <rad(a)nshore.org>
The secret of the universe is|^&*||x|NO CARRIER
The tremendous proportion of spam from non-subscribers has prompted me to attempt
to drop all posts to my mailing list from nonsubscribers, without sending any
acknowledgement at all - to avoid the bounced email multiplication factor.
I have been tinkering with rc.local.s00 in an attempt to do this, but not with very
much success. I have placed the following at the top of my rc.local.s00 script,
but I find that nothing gets logged to the reject.nosub file, and posts with
attachments from nonsubscribers get matched by recipes further down in this file.
My hope was that if this recipe were matched, that no further processing of the
message would be done, and that it would not be delivered nor rejected.
My testing list does not have foreign_submit set.
:0
* 9876543210^0 foreign_submit ?? y
* -2^0 ? formail -X"From " -xFrom: -xReply-To: -xSender: -xResent-From: \
-xResent-Reply-To: -xResent-Sender: -xReturn-Path: | \
multigram -b1 -m -l$submit_threshold -L$domain \
-x$listaddr -x$listreq accept accept2
{
:0 c
| formail -i "Subject: ***Aug20 mod drop msg from non-subscriber***"|\
$SENDMAIL -oi $maintainer
:0 A
reject.nosub
}
Any assistance is appreciated - thank you in advance.
--
Rick DeMattia <rad(a)nshore.org>
The secret of the universe is|^&*||x|NO CARRIER