All,
I am trying to use rc.local.s10.mhonarc from
http://www.ha-schneider.de/software/smartlist/
to set up an archive for a mailing list.
I have renamed rc.local.s10.mhonarc to rc.local.s30 and added following line to rc.custom
RC_LOCAL_SUBMIT_30 = rc.local.s30
rc.local.s10 and rc.local.s20 are already in use and since I do not know how to merge the recipe in rc.local.s10.mhonarc with either of the two, I renamed it to rc.local.s30 and added a new line in rc.custom.
Could someone please help me understand as to how it all works.
Thanks
Nishi
The following is a sample of the results of a search that I receive by email.
This there a way to hide the line number?
ARCHIVE egrep august latest/*
BEGIN---------------cut here------------------
latest/10:16:Monday, August 27, 2001
latest/11:16:Tuesday, August 21, 2001
latest/12:16:Wednesday, August 29, 2001
END-----------------cut here------------------
Thanks for your help!
Alan,
hi!
how can i modyfiy the text for the automatic subscribe/unsubscribe-mail?
The possibilities of a *subscribe.txt*-file in my folder are not enough for
me. I want suppress the information about the transmited data and translate
the rest of the mail to german.
TIA, martin
--
"Who needs horror movies when we have Microsoft?"
- Christine Comaford, PC Week
Hello:
Does SmartList have an archiving and (hopefully user friendly) search capability?
[I'm not interested in the archives of this Disc List, but of the list I run for my
'users'].
Thanks,
Mitch Darer
--
Mitchell Darer, WebMaster, mitch(a)focusing.org
The Focusing Institute, 34 East Lane, Spring Valley, NY 10977
http://www.focusing.org (845) 362-5222 (phone/fax)
At 11:41 AM -0400 7/28/00, Werner Reisberger is rumored to have typed:
> I never saw any
> admin reply to the numerous complains about spam messages.
Actually, that's not _strictly_ true, since I remember when Stephen was
actually maintaining the list (and probably anally have archives of the list
from that time somewhere on some floppy or MO cart from a long time ago and
far far away). But you're right, it's been _years_ since he's been around.
However, the list belongs to the maintainer (or at least the machine's
admin), not the members. You'll get no argument from me that the list should
be moved (I believe I said exactly that a couple of times), but to suggest
the admins need to take a poll to ask what they may or may not do with the
existing list is silly, to say the least. They are certainly able to move
this list to mailman without the list subscriber's permission - indeed, they
_have_ done so, which makes my point for me.
Whether we should move this list to a SmartList server is a completely
seperate issue...one which Philip should probably weigh in on, since he is
now maintaining the procmail/SmartList source and as such the de facto head
of our band of merry wanderers...
Charlie
I was purging the log for one of my lists this morning and saw this
error
procmail: Extraneous deliver-head flag ignored
Any idea what is happening?
--
Jerry Sloan <jerry(a)fptech.net>
fP Technologies, Inc
Here's a FWIW: after a bit more poking around, I've confirmed that
MUAs Pine on Linux and The Bat! on MSWindows confuse a long
series of dashes with the ^--boundary--$ string that is the end
of the digest. I've submitted a bug report to the Pine folks
at the University of Washington, and maybe someday they'll fix it.
One of my digest readers has submitted a report to The Bat! folks.
In the meantime, I've added a workaround recipe to my digest's
rc.local.s10 file that should prevent those buggy mailers from
truncating my digests.
#
#Quote long dashed lines, for broken MUAs
#
:0 B
* ^-------------------------------+
{
MID=`formail -x Message-ID`
LOG="article $MID: dashes escaped for broken MUAs
"
:0 fwb
| sed 's/^-------------------------------/- &/'
}
The other day I asked whether the digest boundary was escaped
and of course the answer is yes, as one would expect.
I was just sent an example of a truncated digest by a Linux
Pine user, and sure enough, the digest seems to end right
at some guy's signature that's preceded by a long string of
dashes (too long to be taken for a boundary by a rigorous MUA).
This would seem to implicate Pine in an embarrassing bug, and
I thought I'd ask if anyone here knows for sure if Pine 4.44
(from the guy's Message-ID) is a known culprit.
I'll scratch around and try to contact Pine developers, but
in the meantime, this is sure a surprise.
Jim
Does Smartlist's digester escape a series of dashes of just the right
length to be confused with the digest MIME boundary if an article
happens to contain a line starting with such a series? I assume
the answer is yes, as a misplaced boundary would wreak havoc with
the digest, and Smartlist is pretty clever about most such things.
I don't see this question addressed in the FAQ, so I hope it's ok
to ask here before I plunge into the source.
My question was inspired by a complaint from a subscriber to my
digest, saying that "The Bat!" is confused by any series of dashes
as long or longer than the boundary. Obviously such a series would
be common, since it's used so often to introduce those popular
advertizing footers in the free mailers. I'd prefer to respond to
this guy knowing the facts.
TIA,
Jim