Smartlist September 2000

smartlist@lists.rwth-aachen.de

34 Teilnehmer
29 Diskussionen

von Mitchell Darer

Hello: Does SmartList have an archiving and (hopefully user friendly) search capability? [I'm not interested in the archives of this Disc List, but of the list I run for my 'users']. Thanks, Mitch Darer -- Mitchell Darer, WebMaster, mitch(a)focusing.org The Focusing Institute, 34 East Lane, Spring Valley, NY 10977 http://www.focusing.org (845) 362-5222 (phone/fax)

5 Jahre, 9 Monate

Re: does anyone find it ironic that smartlist mailing list is using Mailman?

von Charlie Summers

At 11:41 AM -0400 7/28/00, Werner Reisberger is rumored to have typed: > I never saw any > admin reply to the numerous complains about spam messages. Actually, that's not _strictly_ true, since I remember when Stephen was actually maintaining the list (and probably anally have archives of the list from that time somewhere on some floppy or MO cart from a long time ago and far far away). But you're right, it's been _years_ since he's been around. However, the list belongs to the maintainer (or at least the machine's admin), not the members. You'll get no argument from me that the list should be moved (I believe I said exactly that a couple of times), but to suggest the admins need to take a poll to ask what they may or may not do with the existing list is silly, to say the least. They are certainly able to move this list to mailman without the list subscriber's permission - indeed, they _have_ done so, which makes my point for me. Whether we should move this list to a SmartList server is a completely seperate issue...one which Philip should probably weigh in on, since he is now maintaining the procmail/SmartList source and as such the de facto head of our band of merry wanderers... Charlie

5 Jahre, 9 Monate

Re: X-Commands (was Smartlist Expert????)

von Gary Funck

> I've set it (correctly I think) on our server, to collect > email addresses for a company newsletter. I've downloaded > the manual and read it over and over, but when I send > X-Commands and try to distribute a newsletter, absolutely > nothing happens. > > I've spent hours trying to figure out what it is I'm doing > wrong [...] One thing to check for: The X-Command has to be in the _header_ of e-mail message sent to list-request(a)domain.com. Some mail clients won't let you add your own custom header lines, or they make it difficult. I modified the way X-Command works, to support list admin commands in the _body_ of the message. The logic checks to see if the from address matches the list maintainer address, and if it does, it allows the list commands. I didn't add a password check, but that would have been straightforward as well. The list maintainer check can be easily generalized to allow more than one maintainer. The mod is in rc.request, just ahead of the recipe that already handles X-Command. Here's the logic: # # Or is it a special remote "admin" command from the maintainer? # :0 H wf:dist.lock * $^From:.*$maintainer * ^Subject:.*admin * $!^X-Loop: $listaddr * $!^X-Loop-Admin: $listaddr | do_admin which is inserted just ahead of this part of the recipe: # # Or is it a remote X-Command from our maintainer? # :0 H wf:dist.lock * $^$X_COMMAND:.*$maintainer[ ]*$X_COMMAND_PASSWORD * $!^X-Loop: $listaddr | x_command The extra logic looking for X-Loop-Admin checks for the cases where mail to the maintainer is looping. This can happen sometimes, and when it does, bad things happen. The "do_admin" script is in in the .bin directory, and is a slight variation on "x_command": #! /bin/sh : echo=echo # /bin/echo test=test # /bin/test cat=cat # /bin/cat rm=rm # /bin/rm formail=formail # /usr/local/bin/formail subscribe=subscribe # ../.bin/subscribe unsubscribe=unsubscribe # ../.bin/unsubscribe multigram=multigram # ../.bin/multigram tmprequest=tmp.request tmpfrom=tmp.from dist=dist log=log $test -z "$listaddr" && $echo "Don't start this script directly, it is used in rc.request" && exit 64 X_ENVELOPE_TO=$list-request # to convince (un)subscribe we used the right export X_ENVELOPE_TO # address $cat >$tmprequest $formail -a X-Processed: <$tmprequest set dummy `egrep '^(subscribe|unsubscribe|checkdist|showdist|showlog|help|info|wipelog|version)' < $tmprequest` shift while $test $# != 0 do case "_$1" in _subscribe|_unsubscribe|_checkdist) if $test $# = 1 then $echo "X-Diagnostic: Missing argument for $1" set help fi;; esac case "_$1" in _subscribe) $echo "From $2 " >$tmprequest $echo "From: request ($listreq)" >>$tmprequest $echo "Reply-To: $2" >>$tmprequest $echo "To: $listreq" >>$tmprequest $echo "Subject: subscribe $2" >>$tmprequest $echo "$2" >$tmpfrom $test -z "$subscribe_log" || $echo "x_command: subscribe" >>$subscribe_log $subscribe <$tmprequest || $echo "X-Diagnostic: Unscreened, not subscribed" shift ;; _unsubscribe) $echo "From $2 " >$tmprequest $echo "From: $listreq" >>$tmprequest $echo "Reply-To: $2" >>$tmprequest $echo "To: $listreq" >>$tmprequest $echo "Subject: unsubscribe $2" >>$tmprequest $echo "$maintainer" "$2" >$tmpfrom $test -z "$subscribe_log" || $echo "x_command: unsubscribe" >>$subscribe_log $unsubscribe <$tmprequest | $SENDMAIL $sendmailOPT `cat $tmpfrom` shift ;; _checkdist) $echo "Multigram checking the dist file for matches with" $echo "$2:" $echo "" $echo "From $2" | $multigram -b8 -l-32767 dist $echo "" shift ;; _showdist) $echo "--- Current subscribers:" $cat $dist $echo "--- End of subscriber list" ;; _showlog) $echo "--- Current log:" $cat $log $echo "--- End of log" ;; _wipelog) $cat /dev/null >$log ;; _version) flist -v 2>&1 echo "" procmail -v 2>&1 ;; _help|_info) $echo "Known $X_COMMAND keywords:" $echo " subscribe mailaddress" $echo " unsubscribe mailaddress" $echo " checkdist mailaddress" $echo " showdist" $echo " showlog" $echo " wipelog" $echo " version" $echo " help" $echo " info" ;; *) $echo "X-Diagnostic: Unknown command $1" ; set dummy help ;; esac shift done The key differences between "do_admin" and and "x_commend" are below. The lines with exclamation points, $cat >$tmprequest ! $formail -R$X_COMMAND: X-Processed: <$tmprequest ! set dummy `$formail -x$X_COMMAND: <$tmprequest` ! shift; shift ! test "_$X_COMMAND_PASSWORD" = "_$1" && shift while $test $# != 0 do case "_$1" in are replaced with these: $cat >$tmprequest ! $formail -a X-Processed: <$tmprequest ! set dummy `egrep '^(subscribe|unsubscribe|checkdist|showdist|showlog|help|info |wipelog|version)' < $tmprequest` ! shift Basically, instead of looking for X-Commmand in the header, and then extracting the commands from those lines, the script looks for the commands as the appearing in the first column, and then works through those commands one-at-time as the previous script did. The password handling was removed, but with a little work could be added back in. For now, the check for the maintainer address is considered to be sufficient, though this could be spoofed, and something more robust is desirable for production use. The advantage of allowing the commands in the body of the message is that the user who is managing the list can use any mail client, and doesn't need to figure out how to create custom header lines. Here's an example of an admin message processed by the method described above: From: list_manager(a)domain.com To: list-request(a)list_domain.com Subject: admin unsubscribe old_user_address(a)old.com subscribe new_user_addr(a)new.com showdist

23 Jahre, 7 Monate

Re: X-Commands (was Smartlist Expert????)

von Gary Funck

On Sep 30, 2:51pm, Charlie Summers wrote: > Subject: Re: X-Commands (was Smartlist Expert????) > At 2:28 PM -0400 9/30/00, Gary Funck is rumored to have typed: > > > I modified the way X-Command works, to support list admin commands > > in the _body_ of the message. > > Man, are _you_ working too hard. Story of my life. :) > > Please look at .examples/rc.local.r00 for a painfully simple method of > placing X-Commands in the body that's pre-packaged in the SmartList > distribution. Sounds good. I made the X-Command change in a much earlier implementation of Smartlist, and haven't kept up-to-date with the improvements. Thanks for pointing out the example.

23 Jahre, 7 Monate

SmartList web interface

von Werner Reisberger

There is a new web interface for the remote administration/configuration of SmartList lists available. It's a new version of rconfig I wrote some time ago but it's completly rewritten and has much more features: - It let's you access a predefined set of files with your browser for editing. - variables and their values are displayed within a html table. yes/no values can be selected as checkboxes. - You can define which lists and which files within these lists should be modifyable by rconfig. - You can create files, e. g. if you permitted the file footer.txt for the list testing but the file isn't there it will be created if an update will be send. - All commands provided by the SmartList xcommand mechanismn are available. - The web interface can be used with read access for the web server group for certain files (default) or without read access. In the latter case you can send updates via the CGI but you cannot view the files/variables in advance. For the purists: You can also use rconfig without HTTP. - No setuid programms are involved. Authentification is managed through the xcommand mechanismn. - Easy installation through an interactive install script. Available through anonymous ftp: ftp://ftp.pure.ch/smartlist/rconfig.0.03.tar.gz I installed and tested rconfig on two linux machines. At the moment it should be considered beta. Any suggestions and comments are appreciated. Werner

23 Jahre, 7 Monate

Re: subscriber looks like daemon

von Gary Funck

On Sep 27, 8:45am, Jim Osborn wrote: > Subject: subscriber looks like daemon > I've got a subscriber called "mail@<his-domain-name>.com" > which makes sense to him, but causes SmartList to reject > his posts. Does anyone know of a trick I can use to > slip his posts past the daemon screens? Hi Jim, There is a hook for this in rc.custom, I've modified the default setting to reflect the specifics of your example above: daemon_bias='100^0 ^From:.*mail@<his-domain-name>.com' # You could set "daemon_bias" to positively discriminate some # mail address not to be from a daemon. Either with a regexp as demonstrated # or with more complicated recipes that simply set it to '100^0' or nothing.

23 Jahre, 7 Monate

Newbie Help

von Cindy

To the Gentlemen who helped me by providing a location from which to begin and some tips to get started, I say THANK YOU! You have been so helpful. Cindy For products designed for chemically sensitive people, try http://www.zavanahbay.com>

23 Jahre, 7 Monate

Smarlist Expert????

von Vacation Homes Unlimited

Is there anyone out there I can employ to fine tune the settings on SmartList? I've set it (correctly I think) on our server, to collect email addresses for a company newsletter. I've downloaded the manual and read it over and over, but when I send X-Commands and try to distribute a newsletter, absolutely nothing happens. I've spent hours trying to figure out what it is I'm doing wrong and I've reached the point where I've decided it would be better to pay someone more knowledgable who will get it right for me. Please email me at: admin(a)exchangehomes.com if your're interested. Thanks Anne

23 Jahre, 7 Monate

Re: check rc syntex

von Zhiliang Hu

Thanks Philip! It makes perfect sense. > :0 h > | ( formail -r -i "From: $listreq" -A"X-Loop: $listaddr"; \ > cat info/reject.attach $tmprequest \ > ) | $SENDMAIL $SENDMAILFLAGS -t Now I got an extended question: what is the best use of "cat" here? I got the " |formail .... | (cat; cat file) | $sendmail .... " recipe for this purpose a long time ago on this list and have been using that since then, although I thought the first pipe "|" and "cat" were redundent. So a little while ago I put a question on "procmail" list asking why there are 2 "cat"s. In a reply, Volker Kuhlmann <kuhlmav(a)elec.canterbury.ac.nz> suggested to use: ... | /sbin/cat - info/accept.txt | ... Now, among the 3 constructs: 1. | formail ....; cat file | $sendmail -t 2. | formail .... | (cat - file) | $sendmail -t 3. | formail .... | (cat; cat file) | $sendmail -t Number "1" appear to be making the best sense. However number "2" and "3" must also had a reason to be that way (historically or associated with older versions of procmail or have something to do with the nature/version of "cat" or whatsoever). Could someone put some lights on them? Thanks! Zhiliang

23 Jahre, 7 Monate

introduction and asking for help

von Cindy Mutchie

Hello. I am a newbie at running the list software. It is part of my web hosting package, but no online or paper manual comes with it. There is the help file that consists of about one paragraph on the server. I need to know if there is a handbook or a web page with more instructions for {SmartList v3.11pre7 1997/04/28 written and created by Stephen R. van den Berg}? For instance, I need to know how to ask for more than one message out of the archive say messages 20 through 45. I appreciate any help that might be offered. I promise to read the manual if there is one! Cindy

23 Jahre, 7 Monate

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

Smartlist September 2000