[This is more a suggestion to the SmartList maintainers, but I am not aware of a separate developers forum.]
What about integrating (some of) the patches from the FAQ into the next SmartList release?
A few minutes ago, I suggested:
HAS> However, the more common things should be integrated; HAS> e.g., I think that the "multiple maintainers" patch does HAS> not hurt if it becomes the standard. The same holds [in my opinion] HAS> for the other patches given in the SmartList FAQ.
And a second idea: What about including some more example (or frequently-asked-for) rc.local.* files, maybe in a "contrib" directory? Those given in the FAQ seem to be good candidates.
I am also thinking of my rc.local.s10.mhonarc (at least, there have been several questions on this list concerning web archive functionality), and maybe my rc.local.s20.mmmyy (see http://www.ha-schneider.de/software/smartlist/ ; the others listed there are a bit special).
[Forgive me if some of this already is the case; I am still at version 3.13.1.]
Hans-Albert