The procmail script to quarantine potentially malicious Microsoft
Outlook(r) attachments has its own web page now:
http://www.johncon.com/john/QuarantineAttachments/
It can use SmartList as the quarantining mechanism.
John
--
John Conover Tel. 408.370.2688 conover(a)rahul.net
631 Lamont Ct. Fax. 408.379.9602 http://www.johncon.com/
Campbell, CA 95008 Cel. 408.772.7733
Hi all -
I am using Smartlist preinstalled by my hosting co. When I try to
"administer" the list I receive a success message, but nothing happens...
Nothing is sent to the maintainers email, no users are subscribed to the
list. I have no idea why this is, and my host company has told me that it is
working. I really nee to solve this quickly.
Thanks much,
Josh
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Can Smartlist be configured to *not* forward messages with the
"Already on the subscriber list" x-diagnostic to the list owner?
As a list owner I don't think I need to see this message every
time someone tries to subscribe twice. Don't ask me why, but
with my list this happens quite often. I think this event can
safely be ignored.
Regards,
René Pijlman
Hi,
Got some newbie questions, so please feel free to flame me / point out
the FAQ / set the ClueBot on me...
How to disable html and ban binary attachments?
How to set mail bounces to go to the list admin, not the sender?
Thanks, Les
--
Les Sharp, half man, half budgie
Wings Taiwan: http://www.wingstaiwan.com
New email: les(a)wingstaiwan.com
Peter Hartzler <ph(a)hartzler.net> wrote:
> This edition now conains the reject_garbage and reject_html cookbooks
> salvaged from the defunct mindwell site, for those of you doing battle
> with list traffic containing attachments.
Some minor corrections. There is a copy/paste error in 4 recipes of the
reject_garbage file:
| formail -i "Subect: ***content REJECT engaged by rob*********"| ...
^^^^^^
I would change the shell in quotereject and rejectmsg from /bin/ksh
to /bin/sh (I did it without problems) because the korn shell is not
available by default on some *nixes.
Werner
Hello,
I would like to know if it is possible to automatically add a keyword in the
subject field.
For exemple, I'm subscribed to a mailing list and the subject is always like
[java-list]...., when I see a message with this subject, I know that it is
comming from the java mailing list.
Thank you!
Martin St-Laurent, ing.
mstlaurent(a)neosoft.ca
I'm wondering if anyone else has had this problem. I'm admin for a list
and all mail sent to the list address gets to me and no-one else, but
all mail I send to the list goes to everyone on it. Any idea what the
problem would be here? We are running a few other smartlists on our
server and don't have this trouble (this is the only list that has
digests).
Help! Any leads appreciated!
Drew Krause
Hi,
I have smartlist-3.15 running under FreeBSD-4.3 nicely.
My problem is with dependencies on metamail programs because my
server doesn't have X installed (needed to build metamail).
I have located a standalone packaging of mimencode but can't find
the same for splitmail.
Can I remove the pipe-though-splitmail feature in mimesend as a
means of working around this deficiency?
Regards,
Neil Darlow.
--
1024D/531F9048 1999-09-11 Neil Darlow <neil(a)darlow.co.uk>
GPG fingerprint = 359D B8FF 6273 6C32 BEAA 43F9 E579 E24A 531F 9048
In article <v03130300b7887634165a(a)[24.104.7.124]>,
Charlie Summers <charlie(a)lofcom.com> writes:
> At 8:46 AM -0400 7/28/01, Greg Matheson is rumored to have typed:
>
>> I agree it is confusing.
>
> No, it isn't; you simply don't understand the convention.
Considering how often this question comes up, I don't think you can
reasonably argue that it isn't confusing.
For some reason, one of the lists I manage has started to accept
postings from anyone. It was setup as a subscriber-only list, and
I've looked at the rc.custom file to check that the flag is set.
I've even tried setting the flag on and off (removing and adding back
the #), and it seems to be ignoring that control.
I must say that the logic of the comment is a bit baffling - it says
"# uncomment this line if you want to restrict submitting to people
on the accept list"
and yet it has the word "yes" as the default term to use. To me,
this flag should be either "yes" if you want anyone to be able to
post, or "no" if you don't.
Otherwise, it should be "uncomment this line if you DO want
anyone to be able to post".
#foreign_submit = yes
##foreign_submit
</gets off soap-box/>
Can anyone shed any light on how I can get it working? Is there
some other thing that could be interfering?
TIA
Joe
