Found it! It wasn't a problem with the file, it was something with the list
itself. Not sure what, but I finally just decided to delete the list and
set it up again. Then everything worked just fine! Many happy users
reporting back :)
Thanks for your feedback. Happy Holidays!
Linda
-----Original Message-----
From: smartlist-bounces(a)lists.RWTH-Aachen.DE
[mailto:smartlist-bounces@lists.RWTH-Aachen.DE] On Behalf Of Charlie Summers
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2007 7:48 PM
To: Khimaira ~ Linda Campbell
Cc: smartlist(a)lists.RWTH-Aachen.DE
Subject: RE: Adding Subject Designation-Listname
At 6:42 PM -0500 12/22/07, Khimaira ~ Linda Campbell is rumored to have
typed:
> We do feel the subject line addition would be an advantage for others.
I respectfully disagree (subject munging only aids those who do not
understand their email client encouraging their ignorance, and annoys those
users who spend the time learning how to effectively handle and filter their
email), but never mind that now. Uncomment the rc.custom line in your test
list:
#VERBOSE=yes # uncomment in case of real
emergency
...and then send that list a test message. Review your logfile (defaults
to listdir/log, I think) carefully to see exactly what is happening. You
clearly have an error somewhere (it could be as simple as a bad transfer
between Windoze and un*x creating inadvertant line breaks at an
inappropriate
place), and tracing the progress of the email through the verbose log will
help you find it. I'd probably add a LOG= line at the top and bottom of
rc.local.s10 just to loudly mark entry and exit (I tend to laziness), but it
shouldn't be necessary as the INCLUDERC will be noted.
If you run into an error you aren't familiar with, feel free to post
(inline, please, attachments are a pain in mailing lists) the relevant
lines.
Charlie
Thank you, Charlie. This involves about 40 committee lists for one of our
hosting clients/organizations. Since a number of the members are on
multiple committees, it is an advantage to them in terms of email client
filtering easily and quick visual designation as well. None have digests
implemented. The Reply To field remains as default.
We had already uncommented the line in rc.custom, and it still isn't
working.
We have about 5000 smartlists running at this time, and we appreciate the
versatility and efficiency in general. We do feel the subject line addition
would be an advantage for others.
Thanks,
Linda
-----Original Message-----
From: Charlie Summers [mailto:charlie@lofcom.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2007 10:40 AM
To: Khimaira ~ Linda Campbell; smartlist(a)lists.RWTH-Aachen.DE
Subject: Re:Adding Subject Designation-Listname
At 10:12 AM -0500 12/22/07, Khimaira ~ Linda Campbell is rumored to have
typed:
> We are attempting to add the listname to mailing lists on our servers.
Yuck. Better to educate your users on how to filter their mail than to
munge mail subjects. Especially if you have a digested list attached, it
just
looks...amaturish, and with modern email clients there's _never_ a good
reason to do such. Lemme guess...you're also munging the Reply-To: header
field?
> Should there be other language in there?¬Ý What are we missing?¬Ý How can
>we be sure that rc.local.s10 is even being called?
The call is commented-out in rc.custom. Uncomment it. (The same goes for
any other rc.local.???.) Strongly urge you to read through your rc.custom
file so you understand a bit more about how SmartList works.
Charlie
I am running RedHat enterprise server 4 and I am having difficulties getting smartlist to work.
Procmail and Smartlist appear to have installed properly and I am able to create lists, however, when mailing to the list it does not send the email out. I've checked that email can be sent out the smartlist account and it works. I believe there is a mis-configuration somewhere, but I am unable to locate it. Has anyone actually been able to get this to work with enterprise 4?
Daniel Butler
East Coast Technology
209 Lower County Drive
Gaithersburg, Maryland 20877
Phone: 301-751-8247
Email: dbutler(a)eastcoast-technology.com
http://www.eastcoast-technology.com
Can Any one tell me about possibilities about why on my server, X-Command sending the info/help file instead of output of showdist?
While investigating rc.request file, i found that
score generated at line 354 & 355 is 0 & 3 respectively and thus it is satisfying the criteria of help/info request and thus help/info response is sent through email to list maintainer instead of output of x_command showdist.
The chunk of code being executed is as below,
343 # Is it an info or help request? Send back the help.txt and the
344 # optional info.txt file.
345 # We do the same on a complete empty mail (except for perhaps a signature).
346 #
347
348 :0 EHB
349 * 3^0 ^^(.+$)*Subject:[ ]*\
350 (([(<]no(ne| subject( (\(file transmission|given))?)[>)])?$\
351 (.+$)*(^[ ]*)+)?[a-z,. ]*(help|info(rmation)?)\>
352 * 1^0 ^^(.+$)*Subject:[ ]*\
353 ([(<]no(ne| subject( (\(file transmission|given))?)[>)])?$
354 * -2^0 ^^(.+$)*(^[ ]*)+[a-z]
355 * 3^0 ^^(.+$)*^([ ]*$)*--
356 {
357 :0 hw ${cc_requests:+c}
358 | (formail -i"From: $listreq" -rtA"X-Loop: $listaddr"; \
359 cat help.txt info.txt 2>/dev/null ) | $SENDMAIL $sendmailOPT -t
360
361 :0 wfh
362 | formail -A "X-Diagnostic: help sent"
363 }
I am not familiar with the syntax used is rc.request files; It would be great help if you can look into this and help me with the suggestion on this.
The message was as below,
From samsonkt12(a)yahoo.com Mon May 21 02:36:28 2007
Received: from web57513.mail.re1.yahoo.com (web57513.mail.re1.yahoo.com [66.196.100.80])
by HOSTNAME (8.12.11.20060614/8.12.10) with SMTP id l4L6aSuL007889
for <testlist-request@HOSTNAME>; Mon, 21 May 2007 02:36:28 -0400
Received: (qmail 56378 invoked by uid 60001); 21 May 2007 06:16:14 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
h=Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID;
b=UzKUE5dcq70ifamV5cNSUAl3hrq0jJ7IXH52yIKiOkWGGVE8bAUEUI3tZvBw4zOIln/MzNlWQEjwm4BbkAV33Pb5jnI1P59CTDu5ab9rOV/CMrM2KkXlS7KbeDE9l+EAGiJJxyZFJ6LNgBctfGEEo/RX73
1N3esjyHE/J0ah6Vg=;
Received: from [203.199.150.60] by web57513.mail.re1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 20 May 2007 23:16:14 PDT
Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 23:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kiran Telangi <samsonkt12(a)yahoo.com>
Subject: X-Command: samsonkt12(a)yahoo.com test123 showdist
To: testlist-request@HOSTNAME
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1681830078-1179728174=:50055"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <549458.50055.qm(a)web57513.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (HOSTNAME [HOSTIP]); Mon, 21 May 2007 02:36:30 -04
00 (EDT)
--0-1681830078-1179728174=:50055
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Command: samsonkt12(a)yahoo.com test123 showdist
---------------------------------
Give spam the boot. Take control with tough spam protection
in the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta.
---------------------------------
Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative vehicles.
Visit the Yahoo! Auto Green Center.
--0-1681830078-1179728174=:50055
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<a id="folderviewmsg3subjlink" href="ShowLetter?MsgId=4283_37895_648_1470_1032_0_4_2316_1145639870&Idx=3&YY=43936&y5beta=yes&y5beta=yes&in
c=25&order=down&sort=date&pos=0&view=&head=&box=Inbox">X-Command: samsonkt12(a)yahoo.com test123 showdist</a><p>
<hr size=1>Give spam the boot. Take control with <a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=47960/*http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailb…
ml">tough spam protection</a><br>in the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta.<p> 
<hr size=1>Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative vehicles.<br><a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48246/*http://autos.yahoo.com/gr
een_center/;_ylc=X3oDMTE5cDF2bXZzBF9TAzk3MTA3MDc2BHNlYwNtYWlsdGFncwRzbGsDZ3JlZW4tY2VudGVy">Visit the Yahoo! Auto Green Center.</a>
--0-1681830078-1179728174=:50055--
Thanks,
Kiran.
Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today!http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48517/*http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/ya… hot CTA = Join our Network Research Panel
I notice in my Smartlist log following error:
------------------ Tue Nov 28 10:03:55 CST 2006
procmail: Program failure (67) of " formail -rtzc -xTo: >tmp.from"
To: <angenmap-request(a)animalgenome.org>
Subject: Delivery Status
--------------
(it should record but "From: " line is missing)
I checked and this recipe is only in "rc.request" and "rc.submit".
File permissions on related files are:
-rw-rw---- 1 smlst smlst 577 Dec 2 09:31 tmp.from
-rw-rw---- 1 smlst smlst 7571 Dec 2 08:36 tmp.mail
-rw-rw---- 1 smlst smlst 9816 Dec 2 09:31 tmp.request
The occurances of this error are almost all from mail daemon bounces
(only a small portion of all mail daemon mails). Other than this the
smartlist is working fine.
I googled but don't find much on this (what's the code "67" for?)
Zhiliang
So I've got a few lists that are, as far as I can tell, identical as
far as config and file permissions go. But on one of them,
unsubscribe requests work, and on the others, it always says "I could
not find your name on the list", even though I see it right there on
the last line of the dist file. I can't tell what's different about
the two lists that makes one work and one fail.
So, my question *really* is, how do I debug this? I imagine
something is going wrong inside "multigram", but I can't even figure
out how multigram should be invoked in order to reproduce what
happens when mail comes in. I only barely understand what multigram
is supposed to do, and its source code in insanely opaque... Is there
even a man page for this thing?
--
Jamie Zawinski jwz(a)jwz.org http://www.jwz.org/
jwz(a)dnalounge.com http://www.dnalounge.com/http://jwz.livejournal.com/
Hi,
Say I have three smartlist lists on the same host. I send a single
message to all three lists:
To: listA, listB, listC
If all three lists contain the same subscriber, that person gets
three copies of the message. All three copies have the same
(original) Message-ID, but different Resent-Message-IDs.
Is there any way to cause that person to only get one copy of the
message instead of three?
The mail server is Mailman on MacOS 10.4, in case that's relevant.
Thanks,
--
Jamie Zawinski jwz(a)jwz.org http://www.jwz.org/
jwz(a)dnalounge.com http://www.dnalounge.com/http://jwz.livejournal.com/
First, thanks to those who developed Smart List. It was
exactly what we needed.
Couple of questions:
1. Currently, list subscribers do not receive a copy of
their own posting when they post something to the list.
I've checked the FAQ and the manual, and I don't see a
way to allow list subscribers to receive a copy of their
own postings.
For the time being, I've used the recipe from the FAQ
to set up an auto-reply, so the Sender at least knows
that their message was received and posted successfully.
But, for the long-term, I'd like to set it up so that
subscribers will receive a copy of their own list postings.
Is there a recipe that I can add to rc.local.s20 in order
to accomplish that?
2. If I am manually maintaining the dist/accept file for a
particular list, and I want to temporarily comment out
a subscriber so that they will not receive list postings,
would this be the correct syntax:
(username(a)my.domain.net (User's Name))
I'm concerned about the nested comments for (User's Name).
Will that throw off Smart List, or can Smart List handle
nested parens?
Thanks in advance
Stanley E. Laufer
Network Administrator
School of Library and Information Science
San Jose State University
Hi
I have had the same problem. However in my case I want to be able to "spoof"
the list. I send HTML newsletters to the list from FrontPage -> Outlook ->
Hotmail -> mailist@my_domain. In other words I send from a hotmail address
with a return/reply to set to the only allowed address!
This information mismatch may also be in the X-Sender information by the
way! Have a look at the spammers header and they may have the X-Sender set
to the
real domain. It is probably a quick and dirty to redirect at that point
although I think many people use this method to send mail to a list!!
In my case it is a newsletter so after it happened the first time it was
easier to shut the list down after posting the newsletter than to hack the
rcfiles for check/filter for a match between hotmail/reply to address.
By the way I have modified my procfiles to remove all the X-Sender
information
which got me into a lot of strife with Hotmail recently. Because the
X-Sender was still in the header and out of 35,000 emails I had a few "not
happy Jon's" hotmail killed off my Premium account for a while!
Email me if you want the modified file which allows you to post to the list
from a non subscribed address but remove where the post came from. Sort of
allows people to do exactly what you are complaining about but it is useful
sometimes :-)
jon
Prof Jon Jenkins MLC
Parliament House
Macquarie Street Sydney NSW 2000
Sydney Office Ph/Fax 02-9230-2752/2205
Nth Coast Office Ph/Fax 02-6676-2947/1543
Mob 0429178817
jon(a)trac.org.au
www.trac.org.au
> -----Original Message-----
> From: smartlist-bounces(a)lists.RWTH-Aachen.DE
> [mailto:smartlist-bounces@lists.RWTH-Aachen.DE] On Behalf Of
> Charlie Summers
> Sent: Saturday, 3 June 2006 1:10 AM
> To: Harshal; SmartList
> Subject: Re:Spam with subscriber's 'from' address
>
> At 10:25 AM -0400 6/2/06, Harshal is rumored to have typed:
>
> > Any suggestions on how to handle this problem?
>
> Filter out that user's address (explaining to him the
> problem, of course)
> into your private mailbox*; if it continues with different subscribed
> addresses, it's likely a manual spam by an existing
> subscriber. Your only
> option there is to 1) moderate the list, and 2) report every
> spam to the
> upstreams until it becomes too much of a hassle for the
> spammer to continue.
>
> Charlie
>
>
>
> * There are a bazillion ways of writing procmail recipies to
> allow the "real"
> user to post while the clone cannot, but it assumes a
> familiarity with email
> header fields and procmail. In my case, for example, you
> could check for my
> address _and_ my mail server in the header fields; if mail
> with my address
> isn't delivered by 69.93.98.146, redirect away from the list
> to your private
> mailbox.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Smartlist mailing list
> Smartlist(a)lists.RWTH-Aachen.DE
> http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/smartlist
>
>
My mailing list is set up to allow posting by members only but in the
past few days spam with forged a 'from' address that matches a
subscriber's address has been getting through.
Any suggestions on how to handle this problem?
Thanks,
- Harshal
http://www.mumbai-central.com : Where Mumbaikars meet
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com