Chris, Uwe and Jean So essentially our decisions are recommendations. Shouldn't we warn the accepted authors of this.
Shaun
##################################################################### Dr Shaun Forth Applied Mathematics & Operational Research Engineering Systems Department Cranfield University, Shrivenham Campus Swindon SN6 8LA, England tel.: +44 (0)1793 785311 fax.: +44 (0)1793 784196 email: S.A.Forth@cranfield.ac.uk http://www.amorg.co.uk http://www.amorg.co.uk/ http://www.rmcs.cranfield.ac.uk/amor #####################################################################
-----Original Message----- From: org-ad-workshop-bounces@lists.rwth-aachen.de [mailto:org-ad-workshop-bounces@lists.rwth-aachen.de] On Behalf Of Christian Bischof Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 4:44 PM To: Dick van Albada Cc: Organizers AD Workshop Subject: Re: [Org-ad-workshop] Your ICSS reviews
Dear Prof. van Albada,
Of the 9 papers accepted, eight are in our view acceptable with small modifications, one paper needs a substantial rewrite. We have informed the authors of our decision, and asked them to submit a revised version by Febr. 7, in order to make sure that the authors take the suggestions of the referees into account.
With best regards, Chris Bischof
Dick van Albada wrote:
Dear Prof Bischof, I was happy to notice on your workshop management page that you have already completed your reviews. The quality of the reviews looks very good in general, although I noticed one or two strongly differing opinions here and there. I saw that you have marked 9 out of 15 papers as "invited", but do not know if you have already informed the authors about the results. If not, please do wait until the end of this week. We'll be discussing the review results with the scientific organising committee on Thursday and Friday, and because of the sheer size of the conference, we may have to ask to use a slightly stricter cut. By the way, you marked the accepted papers as invited - please use "oral" or, where applicable, "poster". Kind regards, Dick van Albada
Hi,
I don't think by pure numbers we would be a target for cutting as much as mult session workshops with tens of accepted papers. That is I hope that would be the case.
jean
Jean Utke Argonne National Lab./MCS utke@mcs.anl.gov phone: 630 252 4552 cell: 630 363 5753
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Forth Dr Shaun wrote:
Chris, Uwe and Jean So essentially our decisions are recommendations. Shouldn't we warn the accepted authors of this.
Shaun
##################################################################### Dr Shaun Forth Applied Mathematics & Operational Research Engineering Systems Department Cranfield University, Shrivenham Campus Swindon SN6 8LA, England tel.: +44 (0)1793 785311 fax.: +44 (0)1793 784196 email: S.A.Forth@cranfield.ac.uk http://www.amorg.co.uk http://www.amorg.co.uk/ http://www.rmcs.cranfield.ac.uk/amor #####################################################################
-----Original Message----- From: org-ad-workshop-bounces@lists.rwth-aachen.de [mailto:org-ad-workshop-bounces@lists.rwth-aachen.de] On Behalf Of Christian Bischof Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 4:44 PM To: Dick van Albada Cc: Organizers AD Workshop Subject: Re: [Org-ad-workshop] Your ICSS reviews
Dear Prof. van Albada,
Of the 9 papers accepted, eight are in our view acceptable with small modifications, one paper needs a substantial rewrite. We have informed the authors of our decision, and asked them to submit a revised version by Febr. 7, in order to make sure that the authors take the suggestions of the referees into account.
With best regards, Chris Bischof
Dick van Albada wrote:
Dear Prof Bischof,
I was happy to notice on your workshop management page that you have already completed your reviews. The quality of the reviews looks very good in general, although I noticed one or two strongly differing opinions here and there. I saw that you have marked 9 out of 15 papers as "invited", but do not know if you have already informed the authors about the results. If not, please do wait until the end of this week. We'll be discussing the review results with the scientific organising committee on Thursday and Friday, and because of the sheer size of the conference, we may have to ask to use a slightly stricter cut. By the way, you marked the accepted papers as invited - please use "oral" or, where applicable, "poster".
Kind regards,
Dick van Albada
--
Prof. Christian Bischof, Ph.D.
Institute for Scientific Computing and Center for Computing and Communications
RWTH Aachen University
Seffenter Weg 23, 52074 Aachen, Germany
Tel. +49-241-8029110, Fax +49-241-8022241
bischof@rz.rwth-aachen.de mailto:bischof@rz.rwth-aachen.de , www.sc.rwth-aachen.de http://www.sc.rwth-aachen.de/ , www.rz.rwth-aachen.de http://www.rz.rwth-aachen.de/
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by the Cranfield MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
I'd go with Jean's assessment. Besides, the authors need to get going on doing the reviews and if we call them off now, that will not contribute to better papers in the end. - C.
Forth Dr Shaun wrote:
Chris, Uwe and Jean So essentially our decisions are recommendations. Shouldn't we warn the accepted authors of this.
Shaun
##################################################################### Dr Shaun Forth Applied Mathematics & Operational Research Engineering Systems Department Cranfield University, Shrivenham Campus Swindon SN6 8LA, England tel.: +44 (0)1793 785311 fax.: +44 (0)1793 784196 email: S.A.Forth@cranfield.ac.uk http://www.amorg.co.uk http://www.amorg.co.uk/ http://www.rmcs.cranfield.ac.uk/amor #####################################################################
-----Original Message----- From: org-ad-workshop-bounces@lists.rwth-aachen.de [mailto:org-ad-workshop-bounces@lists.rwth-aachen.de] On Behalf Of Christian Bischof Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 4:44 PM To: Dick van Albada Cc: Organizers AD Workshop Subject: Re: [Org-ad-workshop] Your ICSS reviews
Dear Prof. van Albada,
Of the 9 papers accepted, eight are in our view acceptable with small modifications, one paper needs a substantial rewrite. We have informed the authors of our decision, and asked them to submit a revised version by Febr. 7, in order to make sure that the authors take the suggestions of the referees into account.
With best regards, Chris Bischof
Dick van Albada wrote:
Dear Prof Bischof,
I was happy to notice on your workshop management page that you have already completed your reviews. The quality of the reviews looks very good in general, although I noticed one or two strongly differing opinions here and there. I saw that you have marked 9 out of 15 papers as "invited", but do not know if you have already informed the authors about the results. If not, please do wait until the end of this week. We'll be discussing the review results with the scientific organising committee on Thursday and Friday, and because of the sheer size of the conference, we may have to ask to use a slightly stricter cut. By the way, you marked the accepted papers as invited - please use "oral" or, where applicable, "poster".
Kind regards,
Dick van Albada
--
Prof. Christian Bischof, Ph.D.
Institute for Scientific Computing and Center for Computing and Communications
RWTH Aachen University
Seffenter Weg 23, 52074 Aachen, Germany
Tel. +49-241-8029110, Fax +49-241-8022241
bischof@rz.rwth-aachen.de mailto:bischof@rz.rwth-aachen.de, www.sc.rwth-aachen.de http://www.sc.rwth-aachen.de/, www.rz.rwth-aachen.de http://www.rz.rwth-aachen.de/
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by the Cranfield MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Org-ad-workshop mailing list Org-ad-workshop@lists.rwth-aachen.de http://mailman.rwth-aachen.de/mailman/listinfo/org-ad-workshop
Org-ad-workshop mailing list Org-ad-workshop@lists.rwth-aachen.de http://mailman.rwth-aachen.de/mailman/listinfo/org-ad-workshop
org-ad-workshop@lists.rwth-aachen.de
-
Christian Bischof -
Forth Dr Shaun -
Jean Utke