Howdy,
I have been charged with the mission of coming to terms
with Return-Path: and Procmail/Smartlist.
In the interest of protecting my Smartlist-based mailing
lists from virii, I have deployed a Procmail-based solution
and it works great!;) The solution also offers the opportunity
to inform the Sender and Recipient of the infected email that
appropriate action has been taken on their behalf, and offers
them an opportunity to respond to such action.
The trouble is, this notification system ultimately relies on
the Return-Path: of the Sender of the infected email. How does
Smartlist handle the Return-Path:? It seems to be absent in
tmp.request. Does Smartlist intercept via the pipe in /etc/aliases
the inbound email before Sendmail attaches the Return-Path: header
field?
Thanks,
--Paul
--
William J. Broad: "The crux... is that the vast majority of the mass
of the universe seems to be missing."
