This is the situation as I see it.
1) Hascoet - paper needs minor formatting changes, cannot establish contact with the author. Co-author contacted. Source files are present I could make the changes in 20 mins.
2) Kowarz - COMPLETE
3) Kharche - COMPLETE
4) Giering/Kaminski - Has this paper been approved by Chris? Latest version on web-site needs reformatting (wrong style file) and a couple of minor edits. JUST been contacted by Kaminski who says they are working on it.
5) Bartlet - COMPLETE
6) Strout - COMPLETE
7) Hunke/Kim - Chris has approved technical content. I have been sent pdf (but not source) of "minor changes". I have asked Kim to make several formatting changes and advised him to improve the English in places (some sentences don't make sense!). Cannot establish contact with Kim and have emailed co-authors.
8) Kreasack - version on web of 17th is nearly OK, I've edited for minor formatting and asked Kreasack/Hovland to approve.
9) Sandhu - COMPLETE
I'm most worried about the Hunke/Kim paper since we don't even have the latest source and I've yet to establish contact.
I'm unable to establish whether the Giering paper has been technically approved - Chris can you please clarify this please.
I can arrange to be online periodically over the weekend and I can even finalise the Hascoet paper (I don't like doing this but its minor capitalisation and punctuation).
Shaun
##################################################################### Dr Shaun Forth Applied Mathematics & Operational Research Engineering Systems Department Cranfield University, Shrivenham Campus Swindon SN6 8LA, England tel.: +44 (0)1793 785311 fax.: +44 (0)1793 784196 email: S.A.Forth@cranfield.ac.uk http://www.amorg.co.uk http://www.rmcs.cranfield.ac.uk/amor #####################################################################