Update
>
>1) Hascoet - paper needs minor formatting changes, cannot establish
>contact with the author. Co-author contacted. Source files
>are present
>I could make the changes in 20 mins.
Co-author now making changes
>
>4) Giering/Kaminski - Has this paper been approved by Chris? Latest
>version on web-site needs reformatting (wrong style file) and a couple
>of minor edits. JUST been contacted by Kaminski who says they are
>working on it.
Ongoing
>
>7) Hunke/Kim - Chris has approved technical content. I have been sent
>pdf (but not source) of "minor changes". I have asked Kim to make
>several formatting changes and advised him to improve the English in
>places (some sentences don't make sense!). Cannot establish contact
>with Kim and have emailed co-authors.
No contact yet!!
>
>8) Kreasack - version on web of 17th is nearly OK, I've edited
>for minor
>formatting and asked Kreasack/Hovland to approve.
In contact - nearly there.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by the Cranfield MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Sorry,
I uploaded the revised paper and the annotated reviews to my
ICCS 2006 paper page, and forgot to e-mail them here.
Please find attached the revised paper and the annotated
reviews for "Hybrid Static/Dynamic Activity Analysis".
-- Barbara Kreaseck
-----------------------------------------------------
Barbara Kreaseck, PhD Asst. Prof. Computer Science
<bkreasec(a)lasierra.edu> Math & Computer Science Dept
voice: (951) 785-2549 La Sierra University
fax: (951) 785-2164 Riverside, CA 92515-8247
-----------------------------------------------------
I'm OK for today's teleconf.
Shaun
#####################################################################
Dr Shaun Forth
Applied Mathematics & Operational Research
Engineering Systems Department
Cranfield University, Shrivenham Campus
Swindon SN6 8LA, England
tel.: +44 (0)1793 785311
fax.: +44 (0)1793 784196
email: S.A.Forth(a)cranfield.ac.uk
http://www.amorg.co.uk <http://www.amorg.co.uk/>
http://www.rmcs.cranfield.ac.uk/amor
#####################################################################
-----Original Message-----
From: org-ad-workshop-bounces(a)lists.rwth-aachen.de
[mailto:org-ad-workshop-bounces@lists.rwth-aachen.de] On Behalf Of
Christian Bischof
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 7:08 AM
To: Organizers AD Workshop
Subject: [Org-ad-workshop] All papers received
Folks,
FYI. I received updated versions of the three papers I am
responsible for from Jong Kim, Shaun's Co-author, and Thomas Kaminski.
Uwe, will you join me in my office this afternoon or if not,
under what no. will you be available? As for the others, I assume that
you will be reachable under your office no. at 5pm my time.
- Chris
--
Prof. Christian Bischof, Ph.D.
Institute for Scientific Computing and Center for Computing and
Communications
RWTH Aachen University
Seffenter Weg 23, 52074 Aachen, Germany
Tel. +49-241-8029110, Fax +49-241-8022241
bischof(a)rz.rwth-aachen.de <mailto:bischof@rz.rwth-aachen.de> ,
www.sc.rwth-aachen.de <http://www.sc.rwth-aachen.de/> ,
www.rz.rwth-aachen.de <http://www.rz.rwth-aachen.de/>
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by the Cranfield MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Folks,
FYI. I received updated versions of the three papers I am responsible
for from Jong Kim, Shaun's Co-author, and Thomas Kaminski.
Uwe, will you join me in my office this afternoon or if not, under what
no. will you be available? As for the others, I assume that you will be
reachable under your office no. at 5pm my time.
- Chris
--
Prof. Christian Bischof, Ph.D.
Institute for Scientific Computing and Center for Computing and
Communications
RWTH Aachen University
Seffenter Weg 23, 52074 Aachen, Germany
Tel. +49-241-8029110, Fax +49-241-8022241
bischof(a)rz.rwth-aachen.de <mailto:bischof@rz.rwth-aachen.de>,
www.sc.rwth-aachen.de <http://www.sc.rwth-aachen.de/>,
www.rz.rwth-aachen.de <http://www.rz.rwth-aachen.de/>
Hi,
of the four papers assigned to me I see so far 2 revised version uploaded
(Hascoet and Kowarz). For Kreaseck we had settled on the 13th and
with Bartlett I just had an interesting phone conversation.
He told me he didn't realize he had assigned himself as the
corresponding author and therefore had tacitly ignored my e-mails until
this morning.
Supposedly they are working on the revision now and will upload
something later tonight.
Just FYI.
Talk to you tomorrow.
jean
--
Jean Utke
Argonne National Lab./MCS
utke(a)mcs.anl.gov
phone: 630 252 4552
cell: 630 363 5753
Dear Paul,
Can I just point out that we gave you notification of acceptance on or
about 23rd January, at least a week ahead of the "official notification"
you received direct from the organisers. The paper rejection rate for
the conference was I think something like 60-70%. In many workshops and
the main track this can only have been achieved by pretty harsh
rejection criteria. We have tried to be a little more generous in order
to keep the workshop alive, less than 8 papers and it would have been
killed, but this does mean we have to spend a little longer checking the
revised papers than we should have done. The organisers were always
going to have been struggling with the original 7th receive and 10th
accept deadline. Since we didn't know about the extension to the 19th
until we'd sent out our acceptance then we decided to keep the 7th as it
was with the view that this would give us time to clear up problems with
any of the authors who were struggling to get the corrections done!
We do not want to be unreasonable. I've already checked with Uwe and,
provided Chris or Jean don't object, perhaps you could make a considered
review of the referee's comments for the Kreaseck paper and report back
to us by Weds 8th 14:00 GMT, via Jean if you need to talk, with progress
to date and an assurance that you are able to address all issues. We are
having a review meeting for the revised papers later that afternoon. If
you would then send the fully revised version on to us by Friday 10th in
time that Jean can review over the weekend then we can get back to you
with any hopefully minor (e.g. formatting) issues on the 13th/14th.
I hope this answers the questions you raised and gives you the time to
make the changes requested.
Regards
Shaun
#####################################################################
Dr Shaun Forth
Applied Mathematics & Operational Research
Engineering Systems Department
Cranfield University, Shrivenham Campus
Swindon SN6 8LA, England
tel.: +44 (0)1793 785311
fax.: +44 (0)1793 784196
email: S.A.Forth(a)cranfield.ac.uk
http://www.amorg.co.ukhttp://www.rmcs.cranfield.ac.uk/amor
#####################################################################
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Paul Hovland [mailto:hovland@mcs.anl.gov]
>Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 4:15 PM
>To: Uwe Naumann; Christian Bischof; Jean Utke; Forth Dr Shaun
>Cc: Paul Hovland
>Subject: Date(s) for final version
>
>
>Dear AD2006 organizers,
>
>Today we received reminders from Uwe that our revised papers are due
>tomorrow, Feb 7, and from the ICCS organizers that they are due Feb
>19. The original conditional acceptance letter we received from Jean
>indicated that the deadline of Feb 7 was due to a Feb 10 final
>deadline
>imposed by the ICCS organizers. Since the ICCS organizers appear to
>have pushed this final date back to the 19th, will the AD2006 deadline
>be pushed back to Feb 16 (or, since 19 is a Sunday, perhaps Feb 15)?
>I'm not too worried about the Linearity paper with Michelle (although
>given all of my other commitments, a few extra days there
>wouldn't hurt
>either), but I'm a little worried about the Dynamic Analysis
>paper with
>Barbara Kreaseck, especially since Michelle and I haven't been able to
>devote much time to it. We will comply with the Feb 7 deadline if
>necessary, but 12 days for y'all to evaluate the revised version does
>seem a tad excessive.
>
>Thanks for any clarification you can provide...
>
>Paul
>
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by the Cranfield MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Just to let you know I have had a nightmare contacting Adrian Sandhu and
only established communication at the end of last week. He's just
confirmed he's happy to make the changes but I've said the 10th will do
for the re-submission. Trust that's OK
Shaun
#####################################################################
Dr Shaun Forth
Applied Mathematics & Operational Research
Engineering Systems Department
Cranfield University, Shrivenham Campus
Swindon SN6 8LA, England
tel.: +44 (0)1793 785311
fax.: +44 (0)1793 784196
email: S.A.Forth(a)cranfield.ac.uk
http://www.amorg.co.ukhttp://www.rmcs.cranfield.ac.uk/amor
#####################################################################
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by the Cranfield MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Folks,
there was consensus that Wednesday would work out well. However, I would
like to move to 5pm my time. Is that possible for all of you?
- Chris
--
Prof. Christian Bischof, Ph.D.
Institute for Scientific Computing and Center for Computing and
Communications
RWTH Aachen University
Seffenter Weg 23, 52074 Aachen, Germany
Tel. +49-241-8029110, Fax +49-241-8022241
bischof(a)rz.rwth-aachen.de <mailto:bischof@rz.rwth-aachen.de>,
www.sc.rwth-aachen.de <http://www.sc.rwth-aachen.de/>,
www.rz.rwth-aachen.de <http://www.rz.rwth-aachen.de/>
Jean,
I've just emailed Paul backing your 13th decision. Sorry I didn't
remember seeing your final mail to him with that decision so this
morning thought we still had an issue to sort.
Shaun
#####################################################################
Dr Shaun Forth
Applied Mathematics & Operational Research
Engineering Systems Department
Cranfield University, Shrivenham Campus
Swindon SN6 8LA, England
tel.: +44 (0)1793 785311
fax.: +44 (0)1793 784196
email: S.A.Forth(a)cranfield.ac.uk
http://www.amorg.co.ukhttp://www.rmcs.cranfield.ac.uk/amor
#####################################################################
>-----Original Message-----
>From: org-ad-workshop-bounces(a)lists.rwth-aachen.de
>[mailto:org-ad-workshop-bounces@lists.rwth-aachen.de] On
>Behalf Of Jean Utke
>Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 3:12 PM
>To: Christian Bischof
>Cc: Organizers AD Workshop
>Subject: Re: [Org-ad-workshop] Date(s) for final version
>
>
>Shaun, Uwe,
>
>The only answer I got yesterday was the one from Chris (see below, I
>think you got it too) which I took as the answer and
>relayed last evening to Barbara and Paul. Today's deadline
>looming made
>me think I shouldn't wait any longer.
>I.e. I think the 13th it is. I can do the review after that provided
>you trust me with it and confirm with you
>whatever I find per e-mail. I wish we didn't have this conundrum
>because the 10th has long been
>known to be the date. On the other hand I do want to make sure we get
>the best possible version of
>the paper and if the additional time makes it better then I am all for
>the extension. Sorry for the confusion.
>Lets blame on the 6 or 7 hours of time difference - unless you still
>want to tar and feather me. :-)
>
>jean
>
>
>Christian Bischof wrote:
>
>> Jean, I would not want to go later than Feb. 13, i.e. give them the
>> weekend. I will also be at a meeting next week Mo-Thurs.
>which limits
>> my infrastructural possibilities some (but not totally :-)) - Chris
>>
>> Jean Utke wrote:
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>I briefly talked to Paul about this but since I hadn't seen a
>>>problem postponing the due date to begin with I am not sure what
>>>to tell him about delivering his revised version later.
>>>Chris and Shaun, since you voted for sticking to the 7th as
>I remember
>>>can you please let me know what to tell Paul (or send him e-mail
>>>directly)?
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>
>>>jean
>>>
>>>Jean Utke
>>>Argonne National Lab./MCS
>>>utke(a)mcs.anl.gov
>>>phone: 630 252 4552
>>>cell: 630 363 5753
>>>
>>>On Mon, 6 Feb 2006, Paul Hovland wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Dear AD2006 organizers,
>>>>
>>>>Today we received reminders from Uwe that our revised papers are due
>>>>tomorrow, Feb 7, and from the ICCS organizers that they are due Feb
>>>>19. The original conditional acceptance letter we
>received from Jean
>>>>indicated that the deadline of Feb 7 was due to a Feb 10
>final deadline
>>>>imposed by the ICCS organizers. Since the ICCS organizers appear to
>>>>have pushed this final date back to the 19th, will the
>AD2006 deadline
>>>>be pushed back to Feb 16 (or, since 19 is a Sunday, perhaps Feb 15)?
>>>>I'm not too worried about the Linearity paper with Michelle
>(although
>>>>given all of my other commitments, a few extra days there
>wouldn't hurt
>>>>either), but I'm a little worried about the Dynamic
>Analysis paper with
>>>>Barbara Kreaseck, especially since Michelle and I haven't
>been able to
>>>>devote much time to it. We will comply with the Feb 7 deadline if
>>>>necessary, but 12 days for y'all to evaluate the revised
>version does
>>>>seem a tad excessive.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks for any clarification you can provide...
>>>>
>>>>Paul
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Prof. Christian Bischof, Ph.D.
>>
>> Institute for Scientific Computing and Center for Computing and
>> Communications
>>
>> RWTH Aachen University
>>
>> Seffenter Weg 23, 52074 Aachen, Germany
>>
>> Tel. +49-241-8029110, Fax +49-241-8022241
>>
>> bischof(a)rz.rwth-aachen.de <mailto:bischof@rz.rwth-aachen.de>,
>> www.sc.rwth-aachen.de <http://www.sc.rwth-aachen.de/>,
>> www.rz.rwth-aachen.de <http://www.rz.rwth-aachen.de/>
>>
>
>
>--
>Jean Utke
>Argonne National Lab./MCS
>utke(a)mcs.anl.gov
>phone: 630 252 4552
>cell: 630 363 5753
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Org-ad-workshop mailing list
>Org-ad-workshop(a)lists.rwth-aachen.de
>http://mailman.rwth-aachen.de/mailman/listinfo/org-ad-workshop
>
>
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by the Cranfield MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Dear Paul,
DEFINITIVE REPLY
Sorry for the confusion arising from the Atlantic time difference. Jean
has already indicated to you he is happy to go with the 13th - so we'll
go with that. Unfortunately I didn't see the email where Jean made the
decision - hence my rapid action this morning with the deadline looming.
He's obviously more generous that me! Jean is obviously aware of your
progress so hopefully we can have a productive meeting tomorrow.
Shaun
> Can I just point out that we gave you notification of
>acceptance on or about 23rd January, at least a week ahead of
>the "official notification" you received direct from the
>organisers. The paper rejection rate for the conference was I
>think something like 60-70%. In many workshops and the main
>track this can only have been achieved by pretty harsh
>rejection criteria. We have tried to be a little more
>generous in order to keep the workshop alive, less than 8
>papers and it would have been killed, but this does mean we
>have to spend a little longer checking the revised papers than
>we should have done. The organisers were always going to have
>been struggling with the original 7th receive and 10th accept
>deadline. Since we didn't know about the extension to the
>19th until we'd sent out our acceptance then we decided to
>keep the 7th as it was with the view that this would give us
>time to clear up problems with any of the authors who were
>struggling to get the corrections done!
>
>We do not want to be unreasonable. I've already checked with
>Uwe and, provided Chris or Jean don't object, perhaps you
>could make a considered review of the referee's comments for
>the Kreaseck paper and report back to us by Weds 8th 14:00
>GMT, via Jean if you need to talk, with progress to date and
>an assurance that you are able to address all issues. We are
>having a review meeting for the revised papers later that
>afternoon. If you would then send the fully revised version on
>to us by Monday 13th then we can get back to you with any hopefully
minor
>(e.g. formatting) issues on the 14th/15th.
>
>I hope this answers the questions you raised and gives you the
>time to make the changes requested.
>
>Regards
>
>Shaun
>
>#####################################################################
> Dr Shaun Forth
> Applied Mathematics & Operational Research
> Engineering Systems Department
> Cranfield University, Shrivenham Campus
> Swindon SN6 8LA, England
> tel.: +44 (0)1793 785311
> fax.: +44 (0)1793 784196
> email: S.A.Forth(a)cranfield.ac.uk
> http://www.amorg.co.uk
> http://www.rmcs.cranfield.ac.uk/amor
>#####################################################################
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Paul Hovland [mailto:hovland@mcs.anl.gov]
>>Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 4:15 PM
>>To: Uwe Naumann; Christian Bischof; Jean Utke; Forth Dr Shaun
>>Cc: Paul Hovland
>>Subject: Date(s) for final version
>>
>>
>>Dear AD2006 organizers,
>>
>>Today we received reminders from Uwe that our revised papers are due
>>tomorrow, Feb 7, and from the ICCS organizers that they are due Feb
>>19. The original conditional acceptance letter we received
>from Jean
>>indicated that the deadline of Feb 7 was due to a Feb 10 final
>>deadline
>>imposed by the ICCS organizers. Since the ICCS organizers appear to
>>have pushed this final date back to the 19th, will the AD2006
>deadline
>>be pushed back to Feb 16 (or, since 19 is a Sunday, perhaps Feb 15)?
>>I'm not too worried about the Linearity paper with Michelle (although
>>given all of my other commitments, a few extra days there
>>wouldn't hurt
>>either), but I'm a little worried about the Dynamic Analysis
>>paper with
>>Barbara Kreaseck, especially since Michelle and I haven't
>been able to
>>devote much time to it. We will comply with the Feb 7 deadline if
>>necessary, but 12 days for y'all to evaluate the revised version does
>>seem a tad excessive.
>>
>>Thanks for any clarification you can provide...
>>
>>Paul
>>
>
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by the Cranfield MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
