For tasks I just meant that we had two files: index.html and index-bib.html, the second one being an expanded version of the first one.
On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 16:27, Dietmar Berwanger wrote:
Olivier SERRE wrote:
In the page on events we list the upcoming/past talks with their abstracts. Therefore in some months the page will be very long, due to the abstract. That is why I think that we should have two pages for events (as for tasks), one for a short description (without abstract) and one with details (with abstract). What do you think about this?
EVENTS:
The upcoming talks should definitively be announced with an abstract.
I thought of keeping three month of events on and then move them to an archive, say
/Events/archive02_4.html for the last quarter of 2002 (oct-dec).
A table of contents of all these talks (with links to the abstracts in the corresponding archiveyy_q.html) could be kept either
- in an extra file
/Events/archive.html
as Olivier says,
- or, right on the index page.
What would you prefer?
TASKS?
Why do you mean we should have two pages for tasks?
UPPSALA-BUG
If not fixed yet: in /raw/head.tmpl replace line 75
<option value="@URL_UPPSALLA@/@LOC_THIS@">Uppsala</option> by <option value="@URL_UPPSALA@/@LOC_THIS@">Uppsala</option>
Cheers
Dietmar
-- Dietmar Berwanger Mathematische Grundlagen der Informatik RWTH Aachen D-52056 Aachen, Germany
GAMES-Web mailing list GAMES-Web@lists.RWTH-Aachen.DE http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/games-web