Is Pine.LNX.4.44 known to mishandle digests?
14 Aug
2003
14 Aug
'03
12:06 a.m.
The other day I asked whether the digest boundary was escaped and of course the answer is yes, as one would expect. I was just sent an example of a truncated digest by a Linux Pine user, and sure enough, the digest seems to end right at some guy's signature that's preceded by a long string of dashes (too long to be taken for a boundary by a rigorous MUA). This would seem to implicate Pine in an embarrassing bug, and I thought I'd ask if anyone here knows for sure if Pine 4.44 (from the guy's Message-ID) is a known culprit. I'll scratch around and try to contact Pine developers, but in the meantime, this is sure a surprise. Jim
7826
Age (days ago)
7826
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Jim Osborn