Smartlist not displaying footer everytime
Im am using smartlist and have a footer.txt file. Sometimes the footer shows up and other times it doesn't. Is there a way to make it show up in every email eben if the person is sending in html? thanks wayman gsimmang@satx.rr.com anyones answer would really be appreciated..
At 5:04 AM -0500 12/3/00, marketing resources is rumored to have typed:
Is there a way to make it show up in every email eben if the person is sending in html?
Sure. Simply dis-allow multipart/alternative messages from entering your lists completely. There are simple filters available at the various FAQ sites to use as a starting point. Force your users to send plain text, and you'll have no problems with text-based digests and the like. (Email doesn't need to be a web page, IMHO.) Note: AOL 6.0 will _only_ send HTML email. Anyone have any luck getting a straight answer out of those clowns whether or not they plan to fix that moronic behavior? Charlie
On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 03:13:30PM -0500, Charlie Summers wrote:
Note: AOL 6.0 will _only_ send HTML email. Anyone have any luck getting a straight answer out of those clowns whether or not they plan to fix that moronic behavior?
My latest information - as of about a week ago - is that they intend not to fix it. This is about fourth-hand, as far as I can tell. I suspect that demime will become increasingly necessary. Roger
At 10:44 AM -0500 12/3/00, Roger Burton West is rumored to have typed:
My latest information - as of about a week ago - is that they intend not to fix it. This is about fourth-hand, as far as I can tell.
Thanks for the info. That's frankly what I asumed; since the 6k lb gorilla can sit anywhere it wants to sit, it is going to do what Microsoft couldn't, and make annoying web pages the defacto "standard" for email.
I suspect that demime will become increasingly necessary.
I'm pointing list members to the mail.aol.com site, and continuing to reject the mail with a polite notation that it's the AOL software that's broken, not the mailing list; that AOL has decided not to give its users any choice in the matter is arrogant. (I don't expect it to make a difference, but I am also suggesting that subscribers explain to the AOL people what an inconvenience it is to be forced to use the website to post messages.) Sorry...I know this is OT, and I'll shut up about it now. Charlie
participants (3)
-
Charlie Summers -
marketing resources -
Roger Burton West