On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Miquel Cabanas wrote:
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 14:24 +0200, Miquel Cabanas wrote:
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 17:04 -0700, Jamie Zawinski wrote:
the nightmare way:
create several lists, called, for instance, "only-in-A", "only-in-B", "only-in-C", "in-A-and-B", "in-A-and-C", "in-B-and-C" and "in-A-and-B-and-C". I think the names are self-explanatory.
Then, subscribe "only-in-A", "in-A-and-B" and "in-A-and-B-and-C" to "listA", and all B-related sublists to "listB", and so on.
sorry, I've just realized that this will not fix the problem, actually, I think it will make it worse.
It would work if list-A is included in list-B, list-B is included in list-C and the following list are created: list-A list-B-not-in-A list-C-not-in-A-and-not-in-B (The names are also self-explanatory :-)