This is the situation as I see it.

1) Hascoet - paper needs minor formatting changes, cannot establish
contact with the author.  Co-author contacted.  Source files are present
I could make the changes in 20 mins.

2) Kowarz - COMPLETE

3) Kharche - COMPLETE

4) Giering/Kaminski - Has this paper been approved by Chris?  Latest
version on web-site needs reformatting (wrong style file) and a couple
of minor edits.  JUST been contacted by Kaminski who says they are
working on it.

5) Bartlet - COMPLETE

6) Strout - COMPLETE

7) Hunke/Kim - Chris has approved technical content. I have been sent
pdf (but not source) of "minor changes".  I have asked Kim to make
several formatting changes and advised him to improve the English in
places (some sentences don't make sense!).  Cannot establish contact
with Kim and have emailed co-authors.

8) Kreasack - version on web of 17th is nearly OK, I've edited for minor
formatting and asked Kreasack/Hovland to approve.

9) Sandhu - COMPLETE

I'm most worried about the Hunke/Kim paper since we don't even have the
latest source and I've yet to establish contact.

I'm unable to establish whether the Giering paper has been technically
approved - Chris can you please clarify this please. 

I can arrange to be online periodically over the weekend and I can even
finalise the Hascoet paper (I don't like doing this but its minor
capitalisation and punctuation).

Shaun  

#####################################################################
  Dr Shaun Forth                  
  Applied Mathematics & Operational Research 
  Engineering Systems Department
  Cranfield University, Shrivenham Campus
  Swindon SN6 8LA,  England 
  tel.: +44 (0)1793 785311   
  fax.: +44 (0)1793 784196  
  email: S.A.Forth@cranfield.ac.uk
  http://www.amorg.co.uk
  http://www.rmcs.cranfield.ac.uk/amor
#####################################################################