Dear Prof. van Albada,

Of the 9 papers accepted, eight are in our view acceptable with small modifications, one paper needs a substantial rewrite. We have informed the authors of our decision, and asked them to submit a revised version by Febr. 7, in order to make sure that the authors take the suggestions of the referees into account.

With best regards,
Chris Bischof

Dick van Albada wrote:

Dear Prof Bischof,

I was happy to notice on your workshop management page that you have already completed your reviews. The quality of the reviews looks very good in general, although I noticed one or two strongly differing opinions here and there.
I saw that you have marked 9 out of 15 papers as "invited", but do not know if you have already informed the authors about the results. If not, please do wait until the end of this week. We'll be discussing the review results with the scientific organising committee on Thursday and Friday, and because of the sheer size of the conference, we may have to ask to use a slightly stricter cut.
By the way, you marked the accepted papers as invited - please use "oral" or, where applicable, "poster".

Kind regards,

Dick van Albada

--
Prof

Prof. Christian Bischof, Ph.D.

Institute for Scientific Computing and Center for Computing and Communications

RWTH Aachen University

Seffenter Weg 23, 52074 Aachen, Germany

Tel. +49-241-8029110, Fax +49-241-8022241

bischof@rz.rwth-aachen.de, www.sc.rwth-aachen.de, www.rz.rwth-aachen.de