Dear all, Ramon informed me that WG 6.3 is discussing a co-sponsorship of IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems, June 30 - July 1, 2005 in Marina del Rey, California, USA. The question is what TC6 can or should do in that respect. Sensor and Actor Networks are hot topics as well as ubiquitous networks or pervasive computing etc. Until now we have our MedHoc series (Mediterranean Adhoc Network series) but this may not be enough for the mass of newly emerging topics. For the international seminar institute in Dagstuhl we got not less than four (!) applications for respective seminars for the first half of 2005 with the following titles: - cognitive networks and radios - form and content in sensor networks - ad-hoc geosensor networks in traffic assessment - data always and everywhere - Management of Mobile, Ubiquitous, Pervasive, and sensor data. Several other proposals have been more or less related to these topics. What is your feeling? - Can we avoid to deal with these fields? (I don't think so). - Should we establish a larger specialized event? (One ore two particular sessions at the occasion of Networking 200x will probably not be enough). - Which working group should be responsible? Or: Should we organise the first event by TC6 and should we try to establish a WG 6.xx thereafter? Or: Would it be enough to distribute the new topics among existing WG's since obviously WG 6.1, 6.6, 6.8 and maybe others are involved? ** Please comment **. Of course, this topic will be on the agenda of meeting 2004/2. Best regards Otto
Just a minor correction. The working group that is discussing to co-sponsor a conference on sensor and actor networks is WG6.3 but WG10.3. Best regards and good holiday Ramon Otto Spaniol wrote:
Dear all,
Ramon informed me that WG 6.3 is discussing a co-sponsorship of IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems, June 30 - July 1, 2005 in Marina del Rey, California, USA.
The question is what TC6 can or should do in that respect. Sensor and Actor Networks are hot topics as well as ubiquitous networks or pervasive computing etc.
Until now we have our MedHoc series (Mediterranean Adhoc Network series) but this may not be enough for the mass of newly emerging topics. For the international seminar institute in Dagstuhl we got not less than four (!) applications for respective seminars for the first half of 2005 with the following titles: - cognitive networks and radios - form and content in sensor networks - ad-hoc geosensor networks in traffic assessment - data always and everywhere - Management of Mobile, Ubiquitous, Pervasive, and sensor data. Several other proposals have been more or less related to these topics.
What is your feeling? - Can we avoid to deal with these fields? (I don't think so). - Should we establish a larger specialized event? (One ore two particular sessions at the occasion of Networking 200x will probably not be enough). - Which working group should be responsible? Or: Should we organise the first event by TC6 and should we try to establish a WG 6.xx thereafter? Or: Would it be enough to distribute the new topics among existing WG's since obviously WG 6.1, 6.6, 6.8 and maybe others are involved?
** Please comment **.
Of course, this topic will be on the agenda of meeting 2004/2.
Best regards Otto
_______________________________________________ ifip-tc6 mailing list ifip-tc6@lists.RWTH-Aachen.DE http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/ifip-tc6
-- ========================================================================= Ramon Puigjaner Universitat de les Illes Balears Departament de Ciencies Matematiques i Informatica 07122 PALMA (Spain) Phone: +34-971173288 Fax: +34-971173003 e-mail: putxi@uib.es =========================================================================
Otto, I agree with you: sensor networks and ad hoc networks are very important fields and cannot be introduced easily in current WG. The closest working group is WG6.8 but the problems are différent. I vote for the introduction of a new WG to take care of this field. Best regards, Guy _______________________________________________ Guy.Pujolle@lip6.fr - LIP6-CNRS - Université Paris 6 Assistante: Laetitia.Jacquey@lip6.fr, Tel: +33 1 44 27 87 74 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Otto Spaniol" <spaniol@informatik.rwth-aachen.de> To: <ifip-tc6@informatik.rwth-aachen.de> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 8:59 AM Subject: [ifip-tc6] Sensor and actor networks
Dear all,
Ramon informed me that WG 6.3 is discussing a co-sponsorship of IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems, June 30 - July 1, 2005 in Marina del Rey, California, USA.
The question is what TC6 can or should do in that respect. Sensor and Actor Networks are hot topics as well as ubiquitous networks or pervasive computing etc.
Until now we have our MedHoc series (Mediterranean Adhoc Network series) but this may not be enough for the mass of newly emerging topics. For the international seminar institute in Dagstuhl we got not less than four (!) applications for respective seminars for the first half of 2005 with the following titles: - cognitive networks and radios - form and content in sensor networks - ad-hoc geosensor networks in traffic assessment - data always and everywhere - Management of Mobile, Ubiquitous, Pervasive, and sensor data. Several other proposals have been more or less related to these topics.
What is your feeling? - Can we avoid to deal with these fields? (I don't think so). - Should we establish a larger specialized event? (One ore two particular sessions at the occasion of Networking 200x will probably not be enough). - Which working group should be responsible? Or: Should we organise the first event by TC6 and should we try to establish a WG 6.xx thereafter? Or: Would it be enough to distribute the new topics among existing WG's since obviously WG 6.1, 6.6, 6.8 and maybe others are involved?
** Please comment **.
Of course, this topic will be on the agenda of meeting 2004/2.
Best regards Otto
_______________________________________________ ifip-tc6 mailing list ifip-tc6@lists.RWTH-Aachen.DE http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/ifip-tc6
Dear All: I concur with Guy Harry (the other one..) On Aug 3, 2004, at 5:52 PM, Guy Pujolle wrote:
Otto, I agree with you: sensor networks and ad hoc networks are very important fields and cannot be introduced easily in current WG. The closest working group is WG6.8 but the problems are différent. I vote for the introduction of a new WG to take care of this field. Best regards, Guy _______________________________________________ Guy.Pujolle@lip6.fr - LIP6-CNRS - Université Paris 6 Assistante: Laetitia.Jacquey@lip6.fr, Tel: +33 1 44 27 87 74
----- Original Message ----- From: "Otto Spaniol" <spaniol@informatik.rwth-aachen.de> To: <ifip-tc6@informatik.rwth-aachen.de> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 8:59 AM Subject: [ifip-tc6] Sensor and actor networks
Dear all,
Ramon informed me that WG 6.3 is discussing a co-sponsorship of IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems, June 30 - July 1, 2005 in Marina del Rey, California, USA.
The question is what TC6 can or should do in that respect. Sensor and Actor Networks are hot topics as well as ubiquitous networks or pervasive computing etc.
Until now we have our MedHoc series (Mediterranean Adhoc Network series) but this may not be enough for the mass of newly emerging topics. For the international seminar institute in Dagstuhl we got not less than four (!) applications for respective seminars for the first half of 2005 with the following titles: - cognitive networks and radios - form and content in sensor networks - ad-hoc geosensor networks in traffic assessment - data always and everywhere - Management of Mobile, Ubiquitous, Pervasive, and sensor data. Several other proposals have been more or less related to these topics.
What is your feeling? - Can we avoid to deal with these fields? (I don't think so). - Should we establish a larger specialized event? (One ore two particular sessions at the occasion of Networking 200x will probably not be enough). - Which working group should be responsible? Or: Should we organise the first event by TC6 and should we try to establish a WG 6.xx thereafter? Or: Would it be enough to distribute the new topics among existing WG's since obviously WG 6.1, 6.6, 6.8 and maybe others are involved?
** Please comment **.
Of course, this topic will be on the agenda of meeting 2004/2.
Best regards Otto
_______________________________________________ ifip-tc6 mailing list ifip-tc6@lists.RWTH-Aachen.DE http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/ifip-tc6
_______________________________________________ ifip-tc6 mailing list ifip-tc6@lists.RWTH-Aachen.DE http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/ifip-tc6
I also feel that a new working group would be the best path to choose. Best regards to all, Harry
I give also support to the idea of Otto of creating a new WG. Best regards Ramon Guy Pujolle wrote:
Otto, I agree with you: sensor networks and ad hoc networks are very important fields and cannot be introduced easily in current WG. The closest working group is WG6.8 but the problems are différent. I vote for the introduction of a new WG to take care of this field. Best regards, Guy _______________________________________________ Guy.Pujolle@lip6.fr - LIP6-CNRS - Université Paris 6 Assistante: Laetitia.Jacquey@lip6.fr, Tel: +33 1 44 27 87 74
----- Original Message ----- From: "Otto Spaniol" <spaniol@informatik.rwth-aachen.de> To: <ifip-tc6@informatik.rwth-aachen.de> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 8:59 AM Subject: [ifip-tc6] Sensor and actor networks
Dear all,
Ramon informed me that WG 6.3 is discussing a co-sponsorship of IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems, June 30 - July 1, 2005 in Marina del Rey, California, USA.
The question is what TC6 can or should do in that respect. Sensor and Actor Networks are hot topics as well as ubiquitous networks or pervasive computing etc.
Until now we have our MedHoc series (Mediterranean Adhoc Network series) but this may not be enough for the mass of newly emerging topics. For the international seminar institute in Dagstuhl we got not less than four (!) applications for respective seminars for the first half of 2005 with the following titles: - cognitive networks and radios - form and content in sensor networks - ad-hoc geosensor networks in traffic assessment - data always and everywhere - Management of Mobile, Ubiquitous,
Pervasive,
and sensor data. Several other proposals have been more or less related to these topics.
What is your feeling? - Can we avoid to deal with these fields? (I don't think so). - Should we establish a larger specialized event? (One ore two particular sessions at the occasion of Networking 200x will probably not be
enough).
- Which working group should be responsible? Or: Should we organise the first event by TC6 and should we try to establish a WG 6.xx thereafter? Or: Would it be enough to distribute the new topics among existing WG's since obviously WG 6.1, 6.6, 6.8 and maybe others are involved?
** Please comment **.
Of course, this topic will be on the agenda of meeting 2004/2.
Best regards Otto
_______________________________________________ ifip-tc6 mailing list ifip-tc6@lists.RWTH-Aachen.DE http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/ifip-tc6
_______________________________________________ ifip-tc6 mailing list ifip-tc6@lists.RWTH-Aachen.DE http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/ifip-tc6
-- ========================================================================= Ramon Puigjaner Universitat de les Illes Balears Departament de Ciencies Matematiques i Informatica 07122 PALMA (Spain) Phone: +34-971173288 Fax: +34-971173003 e-mail: putxi@uib.es =========================================================================
Dear Otto, I share the same viewpoint stated by Guy. I think that a new WG is preferable for handling the sensor and ad hoc networks issues. Best regards, Neuman. _________________________________________________ UFC-DC - Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil neuman@ufc.br - Phone: +55 85 288-9853. Citando Guy Pujolle <Guy.Pujolle@lip6.fr>:
Otto, I agree with you: sensor networks and ad hoc networks are very important fields and cannot be introduced easily in current WG. The closest working group is WG6.8 but the problems are différent. I vote for the introduction of a new WG to take care of this field. Best regards, Guy _______________________________________________ Guy.Pujolle@lip6.fr - LIP6-CNRS - Université Paris 6 Assistante: Laetitia.Jacquey@lip6.fr, Tel: +33 1 44 27 87 74
----- Original Message ----- From: "Otto Spaniol" <spaniol@informatik.rwth-aachen.de> To: <ifip-tc6@informatik.rwth-aachen.de> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 8:59 AM Subject: [ifip-tc6] Sensor and actor networks
Dear all,
Ramon informed me that WG 6.3 is discussing a co-sponsorship of IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems, June 30 - July 1, 2005 in Marina del Rey, California, USA.
The question is what TC6 can or should do in that respect. Sensor and Actor Networks are hot topics as well as ubiquitous networks or pervasive computing etc.
Until now we have our MedHoc series (Mediterranean Adhoc Network series) but this may not be enough for the mass of newly emerging topics. For the international seminar institute in Dagstuhl we got not less than four (!) applications for respective seminars for the first half of 2005 with the following titles: - cognitive networks and radios - form and content in sensor networks - ad-hoc geosensor networks in traffic assessment - data always and everywhere - Management of Mobile, Ubiquitous, Pervasive, and sensor data. Several other proposals have been more or less related to these topics.
What is your feeling? - Can we avoid to deal with these fields? (I don't think so). - Should we establish a larger specialized event? (One ore two particular sessions at the occasion of Networking 200x will probably not be enough). - Which working group should be responsible? Or: Should we organise the first event by TC6 and should we try to establish a WG 6.xx thereafter? Or: Would it be enough to distribute the new topics among existing WG's since obviously WG 6.1, 6.6, 6.8 and maybe others are involved?
** Please comment **.
Of course, this topic will be on the agenda of meeting 2004/2.
Best regards Otto
_______________________________________________ ifip-tc6 mailing list ifip-tc6@lists.RWTH-Aachen.DE http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/ifip-tc6
_______________________________________________ ifip-tc6 mailing list ifip-tc6@lists.RWTH-Aachen.DE http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/ifip-tc6
Otto Spaniol wrote:
Dear all,
Ramon informed me that WG 6.3 is discussing a co-sponsorship of IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems, June 30 - July 1, 2005 in Marina del Rey, California, USA.
The question is what TC6 can or should do in that respect. Sensor and Actor Networks are hot topics as well as ubiquitous networks or pervasive computing etc.
Until now we have our MedHoc series (Mediterranean Adhoc Network series) but this may not be enough for the mass of newly emerging topics. For the international seminar institute in Dagstuhl we got not less than four (!) applications for respective seminars for the first half of 2005 with the following titles: - cognitive networks and radios - form and content in sensor networks - ad-hoc geosensor networks in traffic assessment - data always and everywhere - Management of Mobile, Ubiquitous, Pervasive, and sensor data. Several other proposals have been more or less related to these topics.
What is your feeling? - Can we avoid to deal with these fields? (I don't think so).
*** No, we can and should not!
- Should we establish a larger specialized event? (One ore two particular sessions at the occasion of Networking 200x will probably not be enough).
*** We should establish a larger event - topics are highly visible and important.
- Which working group should be responsible? Or: Should we organise the first event by TC6 and should we try to establish a WG 6.xx thereafter?
*** Yes!
Or: Would it be enough to distribute the new topics among existing WG's since obviously WG 6.1, 6.6, 6.8 and maybe others are involved?
*** No - this would split subtopics in a way which is not preferable for the future. Günter
** Please comment **.
Of course, this topic will be on the agenda of meeting 2004/2.
Best regards Otto
_______________________________________________ ifip-tc6 mailing list ifip-tc6@lists.RWTH-Aachen.DE http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/ifip-tc6
participants (7)
-
Guy Pujolle -
Günter Haring -
Harry Perros -
Harry Rudin -
neuman＠ufc.br -
Otto Spaniol -
Ramon Puigjaner