Deconstructing the Current Models of CS publications
Hi all, Jorg Liebeheer has circulated this on the IEEE Comsoc TCCC list recently. I recommend reading Azer Bestavros's slides on "Deconstructing the Current Models of CS publications". Best regards, Guy Leduc TC6 chair
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:58:54 -0500 From: Jorg Liebeherr <jorg@comm.utoronto.ca> To: tccc@cs.columbia.edu Subject: [Tccc] * BAD review(er)s. Is there a solution? *
At a recent CRA Snowbird Meeting, Azer Bestavros organized a session entitled "Deconstructing the Current Models of CS publications", which is related to the recent discussion (see subject line).
I highly recommend to look at Azer's presentation at: http://www.cra.org/Activities/snowbird/2006/bestavros.pdf
Other presentations from this session can be accessed from http://www.cra.org/Activities/snowbird/2006/agenda.html
Jorg
_______________________________________________ Tccc mailing list Tccc@cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/tccc
-- ________________________________________________________________________ Prof. Guy Leduc Phone : +32 4 366 26 98 Université de Liège Secr : +32 4 366 26 91 Réseaux Informatiques Fax : +32 4 366 29 89 Research Unit in Networking (RUN) Email: Guy.Leduc@ulg.ac.be EECS Department, Institut Montefiore, B 28, B-4000 LIEGE 1, BELGIUM http://www.run.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/People/GuyLeduc/
Dear Guy and colleagues, First, Guy, thanks for sending this around. ( http://www.cra.org/Activities/snowbird/2006/bestavros.pdf ) I had seen the slides before but reread them and I find they are a good description of the problems that we, also in TC6, face. (I just wrote Jorg asking if there is a record of the conclusions, if any, reached by the panel. If I receive something I will send it on.) What to do? One idea we might try at some of our conferences is what used to be the practice at ITC conferences. I am not sure what their- practice is today but many years ago only a few papers were presented by their authors. The rest were summarized by a recognized expert in the field. In my experience these experts did a better job explaining the papers' significance than the authors would likely have done. (And one of the papers summarized was one of my own!) Authors, knowing that their accepted papers were going to be further and publicly evaluated, might be more careful in what they submit. Our TC6 meetings might obtain a better reputation, too. With best regards all around, Harry Guy Leduc wrote:
Hi all,
Jorg Liebeheer has circulated this on the IEEE Comsoc TCCC list recently.
I recommend reading Azer Bestavros's slides on "Deconstructing the Current Models of CS publications".
participants (2)
-
Guy Leduc -
Harry Rudin