Olivier SERRE wrote:
In the page on events we list the upcoming/past talks with their abstracts. Therefore in some months the page will be very long, due to the abstract. That is why I think that we should have two pages for events (as for tasks), one for a short description (without abstract) and one with details (with abstract). What do you think about this?
EVENTS: The upcoming talks should definitively be announced with an abstract. I thought of keeping three month of events on and then move them to an archive, say /Events/archive02_4.html for the last quarter of 2002 (oct-dec). A table of contents of all these talks (with links to the abstracts in the corresponding archiveyy_q.html) could be kept either 1. in an extra file /Events/archive.html as Olivier says, 2. or, right on the index page. What would you prefer? TASKS? Why do you mean we should have two pages for tasks? UPPSALA-BUG If not fixed yet: in /raw/head.tmpl replace line 75 <option value="@URL_UPPSALLA@/@LOC_THIS@">Uppsala</option> by <option value="@URL_UPPSALA@/@LOC_THIS@">Uppsala</option> Cheers Dietmar ---- -- Dietmar Berwanger Mathematische Grundlagen der Informatik RWTH Aachen D-52056 Aachen, Germany